Ihr Unternehmen?

Kein Logo hinterlegt

K2G 
AG
Bewertungen

Ihr Unternehmen?

Interesting work, but reliability and leadership need improvement

1,8
Nicht empfohlen
Ex-Angestellte/r oder Arbeiter/inHat zum Zeitpunkt der Bewertung nicht mehr für dieses Unternehmen in Baar gearbeitet.

Gut am Arbeitgeber finde ich

The company works on interesting and relevant topics and offers considerable freedom to contribute ideas and take ownership.

Schlecht am Arbeitgeber finde ich

The main issues for me were a lack of clear structures, inconsistent communication, changing expectations, and insufficient reliability when it came to commitments. Most concerning was the handling of agreed payments, which significantly affected my trust in the company and its leadership.

Verbesserungsvorschläge

Establish clearer structures, responsibilities, and decision-making processes. Communicate expectations and changes transparently, and ensure that commitments, especially financial ones, are honored reliably and on time. Professionalism and trust depend less on promises and more on consistently following through on what has been agreed.

Arbeitsatmosphäre

The working atmosphere was generally pleasant and informal. However, changing priorities, unclear expectations, and a lack of consistency sometimes created unnecessary pressure. Overall, a mixed experience with clear room for improvement.

Image

There was a noticeable gap between the external image of the company and my experience of how things worked internally. Greater consistency between external positioning, internal processes, and day-to-day professional standards would improve credibility.

Work-Life-Balance

The level of flexibility was generally good, but the workload, changing priorities, and short-notice expectations often made it difficult to maintain a healthy work-life balance. Clearer planning and more realistic expectations would have helped.

Gehalt/Benefits

Compensation itself was not the main issue; reliability was. In my experience, agreed payments were not made within the expected timeframe, resulting in outstanding amounts that had to be pursued formally. For me, reliable and timely payment is a basic requirement of any professional working relationship.

Kollegenzusammenhalt

Relationships among colleagues were generally positive and respectful. There was a willingness to support each other when needed, although collaboration and team cohesion could have been more consistent across the organization.

Vorgesetztenverhalten

Leadership behavior was the most disappointing part of my experience. Communication was often unclear, decisions and expectations could change without sufficient explanation, and commitments were not always handled with the consistency I would expect from professional leadership. More transparency, accountability, and reliability would be needed.

Arbeitsbedingungen

The working conditions did not meet my expectations. Roles, responsibilities, and processes were often insufficiently defined, while a high degree of flexibility and personal commitment was expected. Greater structure, clearer agreements, and more reliable processes would significantly improve the working environment.

Kommunikation

Communication was one of the weakest aspects of my experience. Important information was not always shared clearly or in a timely manner, expectations could change at short notice, and decisions were sometimes difficult to follow. More transparency, consistency, and clear communication would have made a significant difference.


Karriere/Weiterbildung

Umwelt-/Sozialbewusstsein

Umgang mit älteren Kollegen

Gleichberechtigung

Interessante Aufgaben

HilfreichHilfreich?ZustimmenZustimmen?MeldenTeilen