2 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innenkununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
2 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 1,4 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
2 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 1,4 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Overall, the problem is not necessarily the workload. The bigger issue is inefficient processes, constant changes, excessive monitoring and lack of clear direction. The workplace would benefit from more trust, consistency, accountability and respect for employees.
- Excessive Micromanagement (Clocking working hours based on messenger status and butt-in-seat time)
- Excessive control over breaks, even toilet breaks and coffee breaks can be questioned.
- Strict expectations around clothing
- Ridiculously high employee turnover, which is never seriously questioned.
- Overtime is naturally expected but not properly recognized.
- Work calls and messages often happen after work hours, during holidays and during sick leave.
- Poor work-life boundaries
- The core business model has strong potential, but mismanagement prevents the business and employees from reaching its full potential.
- Below-market compensation. Management constantly promises financial growth, but it never actually materializes.
- Professional work standards are expected without offering professional-level pay or proper onboarding.
- Work responsibilities expand continuously without any corresponding salary adjustments.
- Defensive and unresponsive to salary review discussions
- Lack of basic equipment and benefits (No transportation support or standard perks. Basic office hardware like a keyboard and a mouse are treated as a "favor" rather than basic necessity.)
- The only provided perks are water and occasional snacks.
- Individual employees are great, but the question is "who is still left with the company?".
- Tasks are heavily scrutinized. Almost everything requires approval, which is forgotten at management's side and decisions are contradicted.
- Constant requests for updates, progress reports and trackers, which takes more time than actual tasks.
- Constant changes of internal system without prior consultation from employees and prior information to clients
- Lack of trust and autonomy
- Little to no appreciation for good work
- Lack of clear long-term business direction and priorities, which results in conflicting instructions
- AI-generated feedback is increasingly used instead of direct management feedback.
- Poor office hygiene (office cleaning only once every two months)
- Mice appeared in the office and mouse traps had to be installed.
- Problems are always attributed to "attitude".
- Communication is one-way. Concerns are dismissed and invalidated. Employees have little opportunity to challenge decisions.
- Decisions (that were made one-way) are frequently reversed.
- High standards are expected with limited resources.
- A constant sense of urgency without clear priorities
- Feedback is replied with defense.
- Communication problems are attributed to "gender" rather than addressed as management issues.
- Too much administrative work and too little productive work
ie mangelnde Wertschätzung und den teilweise herablassenden Umgang mit Mitarbeitenden, wodurch das Gefühl entsteht, dass die eigene Arbeit nicht anerkannt wird
Der Vorgesetzte reagiert verärgert, wenn man pünktlich Feierabend macht. Es wird erwartet, regelmäßig Überstunden zu leisten, die jedoch nicht vergütet werden.
Die interne Kommunikation ist chaotisch. Entscheidungen werden häufig geändert, ohne transparent kommuniziert zu werden. Dadurch entsteht Verwirrung im Team. Der Führungsstil ist wenig respektvoll und sorgt für ein angespanntes Arbeitsklima.