Ihr Unternehmen?

Kein Logo hinterlegt

Payrails 
GmbH
Bewertungen

Ihr Unternehmen?

3 von 3 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innen(gefiltert)

Schlecht am Arbeitgeber finde ich
kununu Score: 1,2Weiterempfehlung: 0%
Score-Details

3 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 1,2 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.

Worst job experience of my career.

1,4
Nicht empfohlen
Ex-Angestellte/r oder Arbeiter/inHat bis 2026 im Bereich Marketing / Produktmanagement in Berlin gearbeitet.

Gut am Arbeitgeber finde ich

None.

Schlecht am Arbeitgeber finde ich

No culture
No strategic thinking.
Poor leadership all round.
Values are nothing more than words on a wall.
Non-existent benefits.

Basically, every single toxic aspect of Delivery Hero (where the leadership comes from) you will find here.

Verbesserungsvorschläge

Be honest with yourselves and be honest in your hiring. Your arrogance will continue biting you in the back side. Change before it's too late.

Arbeitsatmosphäre

Toxic is the word.

Image

Reviews across platforms like Glasdoor are having its impact. So as an employer, the image is poor in Berlin. Candidates have rejected offers because of the poor reviews, so that's a positive.

Karriere/Weiterbildung

None whatsoever. No learning budget or any career development frameworks.

Gehalt/Benefits

Salary distribution is wild for such a young startup. But hey, you need to overpay to trick people into joining your highly dysfunctional organization.

Umwelt-/Sozialbewusstsein

Don't think they really care.

Kollegenzusammenhalt

Probably the only positive about this company. You'll be working with smart folks (who have also been fooled into working here)

Arbeitsbedingungen

Very poor. Not enough meeting rooms, or quiet areas. Winters felt like you were working from a freezer. Location is central but horrible since it's right next to Checkpoint Charlie so a location filled with overpriced food and tourists.

Kommunikation

Very poor. There are bi-weekly all-hands but everything is made to sound rosy and positive when the reality is pretty much the opposite.


Work-Life-Balance

Umgang mit älteren Kollegen

Vorgesetztenverhalten

Gleichberechtigung

Interessante Aufgaben

HilfreichHilfreich?ZustimmenZustimmen?MeldenTeilen

A blueprint for how to destroy talented teams

1,0
Nicht empfohlen
Ex-Angestellte/r oder Arbeiter/inHat zum Zeitpunkt der Bewertung nicht mehr im Bereich Marketing / Produktmanagement in Berlin gearbeitet.

Gut am Arbeitgeber finde ich

Lovely and talented team mates

Schlecht am Arbeitgeber finde ich

I worked in the marketing team at Payrails and saw firsthand how quickly the reality of the company breaks away from the image it projects. This is not a startup with “growing pains”, it's an organization shaped by ego, fear, and dysfunction at every level.

Let’s start at the top. The Co-founder/CEO is the bottleneck behind most decisions. Not in a strategic founder way, but in a micromanaging, inaccessible, power-hoarding way. He hides in his office all day, speaks only to a handpicked inner circle, and still insists on giving feedback on things like button colors, headlines, or whether to use a comma or full stop. Nothing and no one can move without his permission. Disagree with him, and you’ll be told to fall in line. Raise concerns with HR? You’ll be told, “He’s smart and reads a lot of books.” That was the actual response.

A major part of the dysfunction sits in marketing. Mid-level leadership is a case study in how insecurity and incompetence can damage an otherwise highly skilled team. Instead of leading, there’s micromanagement, information hoarding, and a complete lack of communication, guidance, or constructive feedback.

New hires are asked to redo work already completed by others, without context or explanation, which leads to friction and duplicated effort. Team members end up redoing each other’s projects in an endless loop. Deadlines slip, not because of the team, but due to constant interference, blocking, and second guessing from management.

This isn’t leadership. It’s control through chaos. And those responsible operate with full protection from the top, filtering information upward to shape narratives in their favor while others are left to take the fall.

The result is a climate of tension and distrust. People spend more time managing egos than producing good work. Skilled individuals are sidelined or excluded from decisions if they challenge the status quo. Others go quiet, having learned that speaking up leads to retaliation. It’s manipulation disguised as leadership, and a culture of blame designed to protect fragile egos.

What’s worse is that upper leadership seems either unaware or indifferent. Feedback from within the department never reaches the founders unfiltered, which keeps the dysfunction protected and self sustaining.

Concerns have been raised multiple times, directly and through the appropriate channels. The outcome is always the same: silence, dismissal, meaningless HR workshops, and when that fails, retaliation. In several cases, employees were let go shortly after relocating to Berlin with their families, often after attempting to raise concerns or propose solutions. If you think actual leadership, initiative, or integrity are rewarded here, think again.

Don’t be fooled by the HR performance, either. They may invite open dialogue, but nothing changes. It becomes clear very quickly that their function isn’t to support employees. It’s to protect management from accountability.

Even the performance review process reflects this culture. Managers can choose who gives them feedback, and predictably, they choose allies. Input from their direct team isn’t required. That should tell you everything about how seriously growth and development are taken here.

Another recurring pattern: hiring experienced professionals with promises of ownership and growth, only to quietly strip them of responsibilities and hire above them without warning. It’s disempowering and incredibly common.

Additionally, despite requiring employees to be in the office at least twice a week, the company does little to provide a proper environment for focused work, especially for creative teams. The CEO has a large, private office where he isolates himself, while the rest of the staff often struggle to find space to sit or work together as a team. The open areas are usually loud, overcrowded, and poorly suited for collaboration. The office policy feels less like a support for productivity, and more like control for its own sake.

You may see many open roles and be impressed by the pace of hiring. The reality is that HR is under pressure to bring in new talent, and will say what’s needed to get people through the door. But promises are rarely kept, and new hires quickly realize that nothing is being done about the broken foundation. The company is simply building chaos on top of chaos.

This is not a workplace built on trust or talent. It’s a hierarchy where a handful of insecure decision-makers protect their power at all costs, even if it means suffocating the teams beneath them. If you're principled, skilled, or simply value your sanity, don’t walk away. Run.

Verbesserungsvorschläge

At this point, any advice would be pointless. The people in power aren’t interested in changing. You can’t fix a system designed to reward incompetence and punish honesty. You’ve already heard all the real feedback and chose to remove the people who gave it. Unless there's radical, internal accountability, no amount of employer branding, asking new hires to leave positive reviews, or “culture decks” will save this company’s reputation internally or externally.


Arbeitsatmosphäre

Work-Life-Balance

Karriere/Weiterbildung

Kollegenzusammenhalt

Vorgesetztenverhalten

Kommunikation

Gehalt/Benefits

Interessante Aufgaben

HilfreichHilfreich?ZustimmenZustimmen?MeldenTeilen

Worst experience of my career. Toxic leadership and information hoarding.

1,2
Nicht empfohlen
Ex-Angestellte/r oder Arbeiter/inHat bis 2024 im Bereich IT in Berlin gearbeitet.

Gut am Arbeitgeber finde ich

The salary was good and I worked with very bright, nice and helpful people.
International team with ~10+ nationalities and nice office right next to Checkpoint Charlie.

Schlecht am Arbeitgeber finde ich

The company was founded by ex-delivery hero staff. The core team is a closed circle of ex-delivery hero people. If you're not one of them then your contribution and opinion gets easily ignored. The CEO has his own small office and you can sense that people are either afraid or try to get out of his way. In meetings he exposed people publicly and acts unreasonably. Conversations and discussions are centralized around what might please the CEO and not on merit or whats good for the customer or the company. Decisions and knowledge is shared only in the ex-delivery hero closed circle. People are laid off without any note from one day to the other. There was no onboarding for me besides the general department intros. Almost no written information, decisions or documentation in general.
They expect you to quickly contribute while not giving any feedback on performance. There did not seem to be any plan for my role.

Verbesserungsvorschläge

They should think about what they need and want from a position before hiring people. They should think about how and when to give employees feedback if they perceive performance to be off.

Company culture and leadership is so far off that I don't know how they could fix it other then replacing the leadership team and hiring other people then ex- delivery hero staff.


Arbeitsatmosphäre

Karriere/Weiterbildung

Vorgesetztenverhalten

Kommunikation

Gleichberechtigung

2Hilfreichfinden das hilfreich2Zustimmenstimmen zuMeldenTeilen