Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
4 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 2,4 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Good idea, nice product, and (at least back then) a great team with a lot of smart people, although about 80% of that team have left the company since then.
Incredibly bad leadership. Founder team has no leadership experience and/or training, and it shows. Lack of empathy, no social skills (communication, motivation, people management) and bad business decisions. This lead to micromanagement and a lot of conflicts and frictions within the team, resulting in a very high fluctuation.
Change leadership team/approach, leadership training for CEO
Felt very toxic at times, especially because of bad leadership, micromanagement, and unrealistic goals
Good, especially thanks to a fully-remote set-up and rather flexible working hours
No real opportunities for career growth within the company and no established structure/framework for further training
The salary was okay and social benefits were great, including international private health insurance, vouchers for food and public transport, yearly budget for new hardware, and more.
Team spirit and atmosphere within the "normal" teams was mostly okay, depending on the team. However, the relationship with leadership was difficult and created a lot of friction throughout the company.
It was a very young team, so that's not really relevant
Middle management: great. C-level: not great.
Company is fully-remote and doesn't have an office but offers access to co-working spaces
No issues here. It felt like everyone was welcomed regardless of their gender, race, or sexual orientation
Repetitive and boring tasks, leaving little room for creativity
-
Practically everything. There is no culture and everyone takes care only about their own benefits. No cooperation unless there is an urgency. Top Management very easily blame whatever wrong is happening in this company. It was the worst place I have ever worked at.
Less micomanagement
Superficial happiness, while very malicious comments behind
Superficial happiness, while very malicious comments behind
One should be avaiable all the time
Little to no options when you start as a Working Student
Negotiate properly, the workload is extremly high
This is not a topic at all
Workload discussed before employememt immensly differs from reality
Superficial happiness, while very malicious comments behind
Superficial happiness, while very malicious comments behind
Do not question anything form the top management
Blame shifting and not taking responsibility
Little to no, everything is being pushed onto others
Little to no, everything is being pushed onto others
Remote Work
Fast alles.
Öffne die Augen und erkenne die tatsächlichen Probleme im Unternehmen.
Die Unternehmenskultur schafft eine Arbeitsatmosphäre, die stark auf Ausbeutung basiert, insbesondere von neuen Mitarbeitern, die sich erst beweisen müssen.
Die Mitarbeiter sind extrem verunsichert
Man kann zwar theoretisch alles machen kann, solange man die Arbeit erledigt, jedoch tatsächlich mit der doppelten Menge an Aufgaben belastet wird.
Welche Karriere?
Kein Thema
Oberflächlichem Lob und toxischer Positivität; solange man mitspielt, ist alles in Ordnung.
Junge Menschen, die selbst noch lernen, in Führungspositionen sind, wodurch es an echten Führungsvorbildern fehlt.
Vortäuschte "Feel Good", Toxisch
Die Kommunikation in der Unternehmenskultur folgt dem Prinzip "Fake it until you make it", wobei das C-Level sehr ungebildet und in seiner Art äußerst unsicher wirkt.
Es wirkt, als wären die Mitarbeiter dazu genötigt worden, positive Bewertungen hier zu schreiben...
_ Stets respektvoller und freundlicher Umgang miteinander
_ Hohe Identifikation jedes Einzelnen mit dem Unternehmen
_ Wertschätzung für jeden Mitarbeiter täglich spürbar
_ Junge Mitarbeiterstruktur passt zum Start-Up-Charakter, allerdings braucht es manchmal noch mehr Erfahrung und Seniorität (aber nur eine Randnotiz)