177 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innenkununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
177 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,3 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.


kununu Prüfprozess
177 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,3 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Comparis offers a modern and flexible working environment. The possibility to work remotely or from home is a significant benefit that supports work-life balance. Employees are also allowed to bring dogs to the office, which contributes to a relaxed and friendly atmosphere. The company develops a wide range of exciting products, and user-centricity is clearly a key focus in the development process.
One of the major downsides is the lack of transparency in recruitment processes. New colleagues sometimes appear out of nowhere without any official job postings or visible hiring procedures. Additionally, it is noticeable that experienced Swiss employees are increasingly being replaced by more cost-efficient hires from abroad, which raises concerns about long-term strategy and fairness.
Increase transparency in recruitment and compensation processes to build trust. Improve internal communication, especially around employee departures, to avoid confusion and speculation. Reevaluate leadership practices—decisions should involve relevant teams and not be driven unilaterally by the CEO. Strengthen the middle management layer to improve team guidance and career development. Finally, foster a more sustainable and inclusive workforce strategy that values experience, rather than focusing solely on cost-cutting measures.
Within teams, the atmosphere is usually very good, with strong collaboration and camaraderie. However, the relationship with upper management, especially the leadership team, is more strained. There's a clear top-down culture that limits openness and psychological safety.
Externally, Comparis still enjoys a relatively strong and neutral reputation. Internally, however, morale is deteriorating. Since the appointment of the current CEO, revenue has stagnated, and the only remaining lever seems to be cost-cutting—implemented via waves of layoffs. Vacant positions are often not filled for “strategic reasons,” which only increases the burden on remaining staff.
Comparis deserves credit for enabling a good balance between work and personal life, mainly due to remote work flexibility and occasional workation options.
There is no clear career path. The organization structure is extremely flat, with a small leadership team and a broad base of executors. Middle management is almost non-existent, despite a clear need for it. Leadership is seemingly defined by the number of direct reports rather than actual leadership skills. For example, the CEO is simultaneously holding the roles of CEO, CTO, Head of Data, and at times BU Lead for Insurance. This leads to a lack of focus and slow decision-making. Internal promotions or development opportunities are rare—what happens more often is that employees are given more responsibilities without corresponding pay adjustments.
Salary structures appear arbitrary. There’s no transparent salary banding or clarity around bonuses—who gets them, how much, and under what conditions. Overall, compensation is likely below average for the IT industry.
There are no notable initiatives in this area.
Among peers, the cohesion is excellent. There is mutual support and good collaboration. Unfortunately, this does not extend to upper management, which is perceived as distant and not trustworthy due to inconsistent communication and opaque decision-making.
Unfortunately, older employees are now rare. Many have been let go or left voluntarily—often replaced by younger, lower-cost alternatives. This is a concerning trend, especially for a company that wants to position itself as a fair and diverse employer.
Decisions from the CEO are often made unilaterally and enforced quickly, even when they have deep consequences for products and teams. This has, in some cases, led to product failures or unnecessary feature development. Feedback from product teams is often ignored, and the CEO’s "Innovation Team" bypasses normal product processes altogether. The broader leadership team seems to act mainly as an extension of the CEO rather than as independent thinkers. There’s little willingness to challenge leadership decisions, likely due to fear of personal consequences. It is quite common that team-level decisions are regularly overridden by the CEO with no proper justification or reasoning.
Employees enjoy a high degree of trust and autonomy. However, there’s strong pressure to deliver hard numbers by month- or year-end. If targets aren’t met, uncomfortable conversations follow.
Internal communication, particularly regarding departures, is poor. When someone leaves—voluntarily or involuntarily—there is often a blurry statement that leaves it open if the person resigned or got laid off. This creates a climate of speculation and mistrust. Layoffs of high-performing colleagues have fueled significant insecurity among remaining employees and have severely eroded trust in leadership.
From what I observed, gender equality appears to be in line with modern standards.
There are a variety of tasks and over 30 different products, which keeps the work diverse. However, this can easily lead to employees feeling overwhelmed, lack of focus, prioritization conflicts. Especially given the relatively small workforce (~100 employees).
Flexibles Arbeiten, Home Office, Computer, Lage
Management.
Hört auf eure Mitarbeitenden. Sie sind euer wertvollstes Gut. Management ausnahmslos austauschen.
Büros veraltet, aber zentral gelegen
Früher gut, heute schlecht
Flexible Arbeitszeiten, Home Office, Workations möglich
Mittelmässig.
Ganz ok.
Es wird mehrheitlich papielos gearbeitet, Bike to work. Allerdings keine Anreize wie z.B. Beteiligung am Halbtax. Sozialbewusstsein verbesserungswürdig (in einzelnen Abteilungen fehlende Diversität).
Unter den Mitarbeitenden gut (die meisten geben ihr bestes), aber Stimmung ist am Boden
Mitarbeitende werden kurz vor der Pensionierung entlassen.
Unterste Schublade. Manipulatives, egoistisches Verhalten mit übermässiger Kontrolle. Unterschwelliges Mobbing vom Management.
Dank Home Office ganz ok. Moderne Geräte.
Die Mitarbeitenden werden vom Management bewusst in die Irre geführt
Alle werden gleich gut/schlecht behandelt. Eine kleine Elite erhält aber bevorzugte Behandlung vom Management.
Aufgaben wären grundsätzlich interessant. Es gibt aber keine Strategie und die hohe Fluktuation erschwert die Umsetzung.
The office location is convenient, homeoffice.
The toxic mindset.
Dissolve the whole management team and get someone in who understands what it takes to be a C-Level leader.
If I could give one star, I would. The new management team has deliberately destroyed all motivation and drive.
Again, since the new leadership started, the company has lost all of its values and identity. The focus is all wrong.
This has gotten significantly worse. Constant firings of capable people, serious understaffing with ridiculous approach from the EEB has led to countless hours for the poor people that are still expected to deliver the same results.
If you're up for a promotion, you get fired and they hire someone cheaper to fill that role.
Certainly below Swiss average, the pension is ok.
None.
That is surprisingly still ok, but getting worse each day. Unjustified firings, understaffing and the most talented people leaving make it difficult to form a team.
same as above
Well, the person that is supposed to be the leader is promoting and pushing for a culture of fear, discrimination and picking favorites.
Three stars for not forcing us to the office and working remotely.
None. Even the highly announced big new company strategy was intentionally disclosed only partially.
Yes, everyone get's the same treatment of disrespect. Loyalty and hard work are worth nothing.
There's no time for that anymore
Homeoffice
Führung, Kommunikation, fehlende Wertschätzung.
Die bestehende Geschäftsleitung sollte dringend komplett ausgetauscht werden.
Schlechtes Betriebsklima, geprägt von Unsicherheit und Angst.
Nach Aussen erstaunlicherweise immer noch gut.
Zum Glück gibt es Home Office.
Weiterbildungsreglement ist vorhanden und für Einzelne auch zugänglich. Karriereperspektiven oder Mitarbeiterentwicklung ist aber nicht Teil vom Paket. Wie auch, man ist ja froh wenn die Mitarbeiter die Firma schnell wieder verlassen.
Unter den Mitarbeitern gut.
Alter, Wissen und Erfahrung spielen keine Rolle!
Inkompetent und Entwicklungsresistent. Die GL ist ein Witz!
Ein Punkt für die IT und ein Punkt für höhenverstellbare Tische.
Nicht vorhanden!
Lohn kommt pünktlich, sonst keine speziellen Benefits.
Hier gibt es eine kleine Gruppe die massiv bevorzugt wird. Alle anderen werden links liegen gelassen.
Potential wäre definitiv vorhanden. Durch den ständigen Personal- und Richtungswechsel aber schwierig umzusetzen.
Dogs in the office
Leader ship, people being hired without interviews, overall management and company culture
Get a CEO that is able to communicate and create a sustainable strategy
Micro management, fear and lies.
Comparis values are gone, the new leader ship destroyed any culture and morale.
Tahnk god for homeoffice, but less and less employees dor the same work
Don't get your hopes up, this company wouldn't ever invest in people.
Everyone is being replaced by cheaper options from Germany and Eastern Europe.
Nada.
Worse and worse, everyone with a opinion is being fired
Zero respect for loyalty. Zero zero.
Empty promises, if you speak up you're gone
One point for the laptop, one for homeoffice.
Non existent, decisions are being made but not hold
Same awful conditions for everyone
How? Investments only in all the wrong places, the innovation team is the biggest joke in history
Leistung und Teamwork zählen.
Strategischer Fokus dürfte klarer sein.
One good thing is flexibility. It’s possible to have home office and work hours are okay. Also HR team tries hard to help with problems but they can’t fix everything.
I work in this company since a few years now, and things changed a lot since new leadership came. Before it was not perfect, but atmosphere was much better. Now company culture is very bad. people don’t trust management anymore, nobody listens to employees. Many good colleagues already left because of this, the rest was fired for no reason, that happens all the time.
I feel very disappointed with how things go now. It’s sad to see the company become like this and I not would recommend it to others anymore
Company need to listen workers better and say why they make decisions. People need same chances for grow and older workers should be more valued. Pay and benefits must be better not only legal minimum. Company should care for environment and social things and help workers grow with trainings. Atmosphere need to be more nice and respect and teams should work better together. Also workers need space for new ideas to make job more fun.
Atmosphere now is not good, very stressful. Since new leadership people don’t feel good here.
Outside people think company is better than it really is. Inside many are unhappy.
Work-life balance is okay because of flexible hours and home office. This is one good thing.
There is no real way to grow or move up. No support for development from management.
Benefits are only minimum legal amount. They give nothing extra for employees.
Company don’t care about environment or social topics. These things don’t matter here, they use single-use plastic cutlery.
Inside teams, we work well together and help each other. But between teams it is not so good anymore.
they gone, fired
Bosses don’t listen to us and don’t explain decisions. They don’t seem to care about what employees say.
Conditions are just okay but not great. No improvements made by company.
Does not feel like there is anything, truth is not being said
Not everyone is treated same, some people have more chances than others. It’s not fair.
Sometimes tasks are nice, but mostly boring and same all time. No space for new ideas, super old tech.
Homeoffice
Führung, Kommunikation, keine Wertschätzung
Eine GL mit Vision und Rückgrat ist die einzige Rettung, im Moment sitzen wir in einem steil sinkendem Schiff. Alle 3 Monate ein Stück Pizza ist keine Wertschätzung.
Innerhalb der Teams gut, insgesamt immer schlechter und schlechter
Die Marke ist bekannt, die versprochene Neutralität eine Lüge
Dank Homeoffice gut, es werden aber immer mehr Menschen grundlos gekündigt, die Arbeit bleibt an den verbliebenen hängen
Für einzelne scheinbar vorhanden, das wird aber auch nicht kommuniziert
Unter schweizer Durchschnitt
0,0
Die wenigen, die bleiben durften, halten zusammen
Niemand ist sicher, das Alter oder Wissen spielen keine Rolle
Inkompetent, bodenlos, insbesondere die GL ist ein Trauerspiel aus einer Person umgeben von Ja-Sagern
Traurige graue Büros ohne Klima, IT ok
Entscheidungen hinter verschlossenen Türen, es gibt keinen Dialog, Mitarbeiter haben kein Recht auf Meinung oder Mitsprechen
Es werden alle gleich mies behandelt, manche jedoch massiv bevorzugt
Ohne Manpower keine Möglichkeit neue oder spannende Sachen zu machen.
Mit der Neubesetzung der Geschäftsleitung vor ca. einem Jahr läuft nach wie vor eine interne Reorganisation an, die bewusst mit der einzigen Vorgabe und Priorität, Kosteneinsparungen zu erzielen, durchgezogen wird. Dabei wird nicht darauf geachtet, wie skrupellos und taktlos jene Entscheidungen getroffen werden. Tiefgreifende Konsequenzen und Sorgen der Belegschaft werden ignoriert. Ein wortwörtliches Herunterwirtschaften ist hier seit einiger Zeit am Laufen.
Es benötigt dringendst einen Komplettaustausch des bestehenden Management Teams.
Ein von Fairness und Vertrauen geprägtes Arbeitsklima ist hier ein Märchen.
Ich kenne weder intern noch extern irgendeine Person, die Comparis und deren Dienste weiterempfiehlt. Das Vertrauen in das Neutralitätsversprechen von Comparis ist auf Grund vergangenen und jüngsten Vorkommnissen in den letzten Jahren so gut wie gestorben.
Die Work-Life-Balance ist grundsätzlich gut. Wird aber langfristig wohl durch Fehlbesetzungen in Kaderpositionen und folgend Entscheidungsträgern, die stark gegen Homeoffice sind, bald nicht mehr so aussehen.
Nichts spezielles.
Berufliche Aufstiegschancen, bis auf wenige Ausnahmen, gleich null.
Jeder versucht nach wie vor sein Bestes obgleich den problematischen Umständen, die durch fragwürdige Entscheidungen seitens der aktuellen Geschäftsleitung produziert werden.
Langdienende Kollegen werden von der Firma, bis auf einen unerklärlichen sonderbaren Ausnahmefall, weder wertgeschätzt noch gefördert. Eher im Gegenteil, man jagt sie wortwörtlich weg.
Absolut beratungsresistente und inkompetente Abteilungs- und Teamleiter durch leider so gut wie alle Teams hinweg.
Offenes Büro mit all seinen Mängeln: Sehr hoher Lärmpegel an ausgelasteten Tagen, schlechte bis keine Frischluftzufuhr und fehlende Beheizung im Winter. Der 2. Stern holt noch die moderne IT-Ausstattung aus (Widescreen Monitore mit eingebauter Docking Station, aktuelle 2in1 Laptops).
Kommunikation scheint hier ein teures Gut zu sein.
Nicht marktgerecht für den Kanton ZH.
Je nach Abteilung und Position unterschiedlich. Es gäbe sehr viel Potenzial nach oben, aber ohne klare Vision als Firma wird jeder nur das eigene Gärtchen pflegen.
they allow dogs
lies and terrible communication culture
transparency
Fear, micromanaging
better then reality
ok, but also getting worse
some internel, nothing more
worst & wordt
used to be, but is actively worked against
they all went fired
Eeb is awful, yes sayer, human is worth nothing
don't exist
no innovating or new tech
So verdient kununu Geld.