3 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innenkununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
3 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 2,0 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
3 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 2,0 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
1. The company offers proven, high quality products that genuinely help patients and make a meaningful impact.
2. Many colleagues are dedicated and supportive, creating pockets of strong teamwork despite broader challenges.
1. Leadership decisions and communication sometimes feel unclear or inconsistent, which can affect day-to-day work and stability.
2. Structural and organizational challenges occasionally limit employees’ ability to contribute effectively or develop further.
1. Strengthen leadership accountability and consistency to rebuild trust and align words with actions.
2. Increase capacity and empower employees with clearer roles, autonomy and development opportunities.
Behind the glossy facade of a “Best Place to Work”, a pure command and control culture prevails, and the leadership does not live up to its own words.
Although employees talk reasonably well about the company, the external image fails to reflect the internal challenges and the poorly managed wave of departures.
Work-life balance is strained by high workload and pressure, with individual experience largely dictated by direct manager.
Development paths lack structure, relying on individual managers and occasionally prioritizing favoritism over capabilities and values.
Compensation acceptable but slightly below market, while benefits lag further behind employee expectations and vary significantly by country.
Environmental focus exists in Europe, but global commitment lags behind - recent shifts to sea freight are positive, yet the long-requested European sustainability role still lacks real support.
Team cohesion is generally solid, but heavily dependent on manager - cannot compensate for the lack of genuine interest or insight from the global leadership into Europe.
Older employees fear being pushed aside, some keep quiet in order not to get in the focus, develop opportunities for them are fewer.
Leadership lacks real strategy, offers little empowerment, and relies on words that’s aren’t lived in practice.
Working conditions are mixed: computers are adequate, the car policy is outdated and mis-aligned with field team needs; the Amsterdam office is good, though heating and cooling issues occur.
Polished on the outside, pressured and uneven on the inside
Equal opportunities fall short, with too little buffer in small teams and limited willingness from leadership to support parents returning to work. Women are supported in general.
High workload with limited influence over one’s tasks, often falling short of what colleagues hope for.