5 von 42 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innen(gefiltert)kununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
5 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 2,9 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
5 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 2,9 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
The team.
Everything but the team.
Just change entire sr.management and listen to your technical teams. It's very hard to work in a company that's supposed to be a startup but that's affraid of taking risks innovating.
Management will always hear to the same 2-3 people that tell them what they want to hear. Unbearable.
Even the Learning and Development budget is micromanaged.
Cero, they would sign a contract with any company that appears on the pipeline.
People (not management) are normally nice.
Worst part of the company, sr.management constanty undermines, manipulates and complicates things unnecessarily.
Shady and dishonest from SR.Management. Team is very open and positive.
Very bad, only good if you are German working in Cologne.
Good product idea and vision.
Open-minded leadership and work colleagues
Pioneer in its field and industry-leader serving the largest 10 bn+ FMCG companies in the world
Performance is valued and recognized
Individual personnel development budget for everyone
Nice benefits, such as gym, competitive salary
The company measures its ESG scoring
Great people who like to hang out together after work
Age does not matter at all
Visionary founders with best-in-class consulting background
Remote work possible at any location
Regular company updates and constant slack updates allow to keep all employees informed and involved
Highly diverse and inclusive workforce
High growth environment offers a vast spectrum of exciting tasks
A fast-paced startup environment with exceptional team support and the opportunity to make a real impact
As is typical for startups, the work environment operates on a give-and-take basis. While some days may require longer hours to meet project deadlines, the team is highly respectful of personal needs, such as emergencies or doctor visits. It's a fair model that works well for my personal work-life balance.
Not sure that there are a lot of applications in our field of work
A highly supportive team where everyone is willing to go the extra mile to help. Buynomics is at a great stage as a startup, with a size that still allows you to know nearly everyone personally.
Like most tech startups, Buynomics has a relatively young workforce, which may be a result of the specific experience required. However, this may balance out as the company grows over time.
I’m satisfied with what I’ve seen so far. I would describe the general management style as one of supportive enablement.
A hybrid and remote work culture, with the option to use offices in Cologne and Barcelona, both of which are fully equipped with everything one might need.
Transparent and direct communication, with a strong emphasis on cultivating a constructive and productive company culture that fosters cross-functional collaboration
I haven’t been in a position to evaluate this fully yet, but I’ve neither heard nor experienced any issues related to equality.
One of the upsides of working in startups is the diversity of tasks—no two days are ever the same. It’s the kind of environment that suits certain personalities, and personally, I love it.
Regrettably, I cannot offer any positive remarks about Buynomics. My experience with the company was profoundly unpleasant, and I sincerely hope to avoid such an encounter in the future.
I would like to recommend that the management critically assess their own qualifications and ability to lead teams. If they find themselves lacking in competence, it would be prudent for the company to seek more experienced leaders.
My team is graced by the presence of a leader whose remarkable talents lie not in team enablement, but in the art of liberating bonuses from their rightful owners – a true virtuoso in the realm of incompetence!
The company is striving to establish itself as a cutting-edge solution provider. However, a challenge arises in the form of limited transparency regarding the methodology underlying their so called machine learning solution, which can impede the product's marketability.
Apparently, one must relish the privilege of toiling away for a mere 12 hours just to manage their workload.
In their admirable script for employee termination, they kindly inquire about your future career aspirations. Then, with a level of strategic brilliance that leaves one in awe, they employ these very goals as a catalyst for your departure. Their approach often involves the eloquent phrase, "Because we're unable to support your career goals, we cordially encourage you to explore opportunities elsewhere."
An intriguing phenomenon unfolded within the company: the art of monumental salary disparities, despite sharing identical roles and tasks with colleagues. Astonishingly, the chasm in compensation could reach a jaw-dropping 35-45%, a true testament to the mysteries of corporate remuneration logic!
It is evident that they have not yet implemented any CSR.
Their remarkable "asset" seems to be the intricate web of office politics! A true marvel to behold, as management skillfully averts their gaze when confronted with any pesky conflicts or disputes.
Collaborative projects with colleagues can sometimes become quite complex, marked by frequent instances of miscommunication and a tendency to attribute mistakes to one another, which seems to be a recurrent issue within the company.
The management's approach, marked by a perceived sense of superiority, has created an environment where employees feel undervalued and disrespected. Additionally, there is a notable reluctance to entertain constructive criticism.
The working conditions could only be described as sublimely dreadful, marked by an astonishingly equal-opportunity discrimination among all employees. In a stroke of unmatched brilliance, they recruited individuals from abroad who graced the office with their presence once every 5-6 months. Astonishingly, I found myself being held accountable for the egregious sin of not attending the office thrice a week, while my manager, in his unparalleled dedication, opted to toil remotely and visited the office on the occasional whim of every 2-3 months.
The utilization of a derogatory tone coupled with an air of superiority is quite common.
Gender diversity within the company is notably low, with predominantly male leadership, which may sometimes lead to an experience of diminished significance.
The tasks assigned to me were nothing short of exhilarating in their monotonous nature. Quite the revelation to find myself handling responsibilities that one might have assumed were meant for my manager!
Some colleagues are nice.
Everything.
There is basically no atmosphere. Management separate theirselves from the rest and their opinion is the truth. That's the base of the entire atmosphere. If you're not a data or engineering specialist, they do not appreciate your effort as you do not add value to the product. The turnover rate is very high which also indicates a problematic atmosphere.
It's your decision: working for Buynomics and no life or not working for Buynomics and having a work-life-balance.
Working hours of 60h/week and more are usual and they expect it. Even when you flag the workload nothing will change. You will also realise people working when they are on sick leave, on vacation, at weekends... is that legally compliant in Germany/Spain? Anyways, it's unhealthy and puts pressure on all employees.
Career starts with an onboarding. There is none. There is a general/organisational onboarding but no professional by your team/leader.
They have a development budget but it's not enough for reasonable courses. None of their leaders has ever learned being a people lead. How are they supposed to develop their team members? You might end up having a leader who has no clue about your job, so you will probably not have a mentor.
Being a people pleaser helps a lot in this company.
Other companies, also startups, pay ~40% more. They offer almost no benefits. They try to catch you with shares and a steep learning curve which is ridiciulous in times of high inflation.
Their hire & fire culture is unbelievable. They hire from abroad and relocate to fire at the end of probation. Also, they fire because of underperformance. But how should you perform when nobody onboards you adequately? Even after probation, they find ways to let people go.
People shooting eachother is not uncommon.
The only "older" employee left. There's basically no diversity in this regard.
The management are kings and queens in their kingdom. They try to pretend being leaders but in crucial situations when a real leader is needed, they fail.
Everything needs to be done asap does not matter how and how much capacity you have.
Depending on the team, it is better or worse. In general, their is room for improvement.
Women do not have the same career opportunities as men. Sick people are judged. Salaries are a big secret, so probably also financial discrimination. People pleaser have career opportunities.
The only positive thing.