35 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innenkununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
35 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,8 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
35 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,8 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
The people are really nice and there is a lot of cultural diversity. People just get on with each other pretty well and that makes it fun. I get to own a lot of topics and drive how I do my projects. Sometimes it can feel a bit unclear around what we're focusing on, but we also need to keep pace with how the market is changing, world events and what our clients are dealing with. Overall it's an interesting product and people try their best to make this a good place to work.
There are some truly fantastic and dedicated people at the company who make the experience worthwhile. Unfortunately, many of them have had to leave due to the uncomfortable environment and the lack of growth and progression opportunities.
Hostility, favouritism and lack of transparency
There are many areas at the company that urgently need improvement.
• Recognition of hard work: While a few managers do this well, most tend to recognise only their favourites or those who seek visibility. Many employees’ contributions go unnoticed and are rarely met with a simple “thank you” or “well done.” Leadership should actively acknowledge both small wins and major achievements, as well as mistakes that lead to valuable learning. A true culture of appreciation needs to be developed.
• Promotion of only the most vocal employees: Too much weight is placed on loudness and visibility rather than actual impact. All team members and their contributions should be valued equally. Being outspoken does not automatically mean being effective.
• Lack of development plans: The People team has been talking about development and growth as a priority since last year, yet no concrete structures or plans have been implemented. Despite repeated messaging, nothing has meaningfully changed.
• No genuine psychological safety for feedback: Although direct feedback is strongly promoted, in practice it has created more negativity than openness in many teams. It does not encourage people to share their real opinions, as the environment does not feel truly safe.
• Leadership encouraging people to leave rather than retain them: Employees are sometimes told that “if enmacc is not the right place for them, they should leave.” This is counterproductive and inappropriate. Instead of pushing people out, leadership and HR should focus on understanding concerns and improving retention.
• Culture of exclusion and gossip: What was once a fun and collaborative environment has shifted into one marked by cliques, exclusion, gossip, and in some cases bullying and harassment. This is a serious issue that has not been adequately addressed.
• Unapproachable People team: The People team used to be accessible and supportive. Now, the very people meant to resolve conflicts and protect employees often appear performative in their empathy and not genuinely aligned with employees’ interests. Issues raised frequently lead to negative consequences rather than support.
• Poor retention and damaging dismissal practices: There have been several distressing terminations, including people later returning. Leadership seems unaware of the negative impact this has on morale, trust, and psychological safety. Employees increasingly fear consequences for associating with former colleagues, which has created a hostel-like, insecure environment.
• Lack of salary transparency and fairness: The company does not appear to comply with Germany’s legal requirements for salary transparency. Employees in the same roles are paid very differently, often without justification. Favouritism seems to play a role, with some of the highest-paid individuals contributing the least.
Overall, since the environment does not feel safe enough to express honest opinions internally, these review channels have become the only viable way to provide feedback. It is now up to the leadership team to take responsibility and initiate meaningful change.
All the real reviews have been deleted. The environment has a corporate mindset with a highschool setup. People are cold, they don’t care about employees, nice to new ones, cold to older ones.
If you are interviewing to join, don’t. It is not a healthy environment at all.
The working equipment provided and phone contract
A few kind and genuine employees
More humane HR team and People Directors. The HR team is cold and not employee oriented. Just business focused.
Leadership team also needs to be more humane.
Fair salaries, they are relatively low for Munich and only favourites of the leaders or HR get promoted or high salaries. Also people who speak louder or are more extrovert get benefits when all types of people and backgrounds should be considered.
Just not a nice environment. Friendship focused, can feel like school environment and isolating. Happy to never go back and would not recommend. They delete reviews so all the honest and truthful ones are gone.
• Some colleagues are highly professional and genuinely supportive.
• Flexible work arrangements are theoretically possible, which can help with work-life balance.
• Disorganised workflows and sudden changes in priorities.
• Favouritism and nepotism affecting opportunities, recognition, and career progression.
• Performance reviews that feel subjective and disconnected from actual contributions.
• Hybrid model that favours employees who are regularly in the office.
• Professional conduct issues not addressed adequately, even when reported.
• Selective deletion of reviews that contain valid but critical feedback.
• Apply rules and processes consistently to all employees, regardless of personal relationships.
• Increase transparency in decision-making, promotions, and performance reviews.
• Address micromanagement tendencies and give employees more autonomy.
• Ensure hybrid work is truly equal in practice, not just in policy.
• Strengthen professional conduct standards and ensure HR follows through on reported issues.
• Allow all employee feedback — positive and negative — to remain visible so external perception matches internal reality.
Work priorities can change abruptly, creating a sense of instability and disorganisation.
Hybrid work is officially offered, which can help with flexibility, but in practice, being in the office often brings more visibility and advantages. Workload can be high at times, making it harder to fully disconnect.
Standards of professional conduct are not always upheld, and raising issues through official channels does not consistently lead to change.
• Recognition of good work sometimes depends more on personal connections than on results.
• Performance evaluations can feel subjective and not always aligned with actual contributions.
A few dedicated and supportive colleagues who try to deliver quality work despite challenges.
Some long-standing employees and managers adopt a controlling, overly detailed management style that limits autonomy.
Communication from leadership is often unclear, with limited transparency around decision-making.
Publicly available feedback on the company may not tell the full story, as some critical yet constructive reviews have reportedly been removed, which can give a misleading impression of the overall employee experience.
Communication from leadership is often unclear, with limited transparency around decision-making.
The company offers solid benefits such as German language classes, high-quality tech equipment (laptop, phone, headphones), a Job Deutschland Ticket, gym membership co-pay, and free snacks and drinks in the office. These perks contribute positively to the work experience. Salary, however, could be more competitive considering the workload and responsibilities.
• Certain individuals seem to receive preferential treatment, leading to inconsistent application of rules and processes.
• Although the company promotes hybrid work, employees who are regularly present in the office (outside of the mandated days) tend to receive more visibility and informal advantages.
Friendships/closeness to higher ups, being loud and visibility in the company trumps merit.
All the previous negative reviews that have been deleted are true, toxic environment, highschool like culture, no trust from leadership to the teams, women are not treated nicely or respected, the list goes on.
I would not recommend.
Open communication, appreciation of diversity in the company
Leadership need to be more flexible with their availability and show more appreciation/recognition to employees
It is a really nice environment with a lot of international people from around the world. It felt like working with friends in the office and did not feel excluded especially on my first day.
The onboarding process went really well with HR, she was also my recruiter during the hiring and organised a fancy breakfast for us together with the HR onboarding plus it setup. My team took over after, welcomed me and a team lunch was organised for me to get to know them more. In the last year of being at the company there have of course been ups and downs as any company of this size would experience but always appreciated the support from the team and the support from HR even when it was difficult to speak to my manager sometimes.
The Abroad working was a high selling point because I got to work from my home country and I enjoyed the flexibility the company had with working.
I recommend this place if you are looking for an employer to learn a lot and make an impact. There are growth opportunities but it can be be limited depending on the team.
My experience at Enmacc has been incredibly positive. From day one, I was welcomed into a supportive and friendly environment, which made the onboarding process much smoother.
As a dynamic workplace, Enmacc gave me the opportunity to connect with people from different departments, making my experience even more enriching. The internship program was well-structured from the beginning, with plenty of resources to help me understand the company’s work methods. Despite working on a standalone project, I felt integrated into the team. The team is open to suggestions and improvements, which made me feel capable of contributing in a meaningful way.
I had continuous mentorship and guidance throughout my first month, which has been invaluable. Even though it has only been four weeks, I have already gained a wealth of knowledge and insights.
So verdient kununu Geld.