Ihr Unternehmen?
Basierend auf Daten aus 4 Bewertungen schätzen Mitarbeiter:innen bei Hashtag You die Unternehmenskultur als modern ein, was weitgehend mit dem Branchendurchschnitt übereinstimmt. Die Zufriedenheit mit der Unternehmenskultur beträgt 2,3 Punkte auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 basierend auf 6 Bewertungen.
Nutze deine Stimme und verrate uns, wie die Unternehmenskultur deines Arbeitgebers wirklich aussieht.
Die Unternehmenskultur kann in vier wichtige Dimensionen eingeteilt werden: Work-Life-Balance, Zusammenarbeit, Führung und strategische Ausrichtung. Jede dieser Dimensionen hat ihren eigenen Maßstab zwischen traditionell und modern.
4 User:innen haben eine Kulturbewertung abgegeben. Diese Faktoren wurden am häufigsten ausgewählt, um die Unternehmenskultur zu beschreiben.
Umgang miteinanderModern
Umgang miteinanderModern
Umgang miteinanderModern
Umgang miteinanderModern
Work-Life BalanceTraditionell
Hast du gewusst, dass es 6 Fragen zur Unternehmenskultur gibt, wenn du einen Arbeitgeber auf kununu bewertest? Hier sind die neuesten dieser Kommentare.
Communication had to be taken over by people who actually understood how to communicate transparently without starting a panic. One time, when these more competent people were on PTO, the remaining CEO told everyone that there won't be any salary raises (even though they had been promised in writing) but since he decided to also not increase his salary, everyone should be very satisfied and looking up to his selfless behaviour. Communication among colleagues was nice but often tinted by everyone's own fear of being let go sooner or later. HR fought for their life but could not deal with that level of delusion.
Very good amongst certain groups but overall the employees were friendly, respectful and empathic young people. C-level is a different story.
On paper okay, in real life I can only second what has been written in an older review: you start with 110% but that quickly becomes the standard and if you don't match the new expectations of giving 150% and more it's framed as poor performance.
Team leads and Head ofs were mostly competent people, my one star is for everyone who fought for a culture that was worth working for. C-level was more and more living in a world that was framed, supported and confirmed by everyone else on C-level. They could never accept having made a mistake and always searched the fault in some poor employee who dared to give slightly critical feedback. I remain so confused by everyone who decided to stay in this company and can only assume that this has to do with the fact that the company had been acquired.
Very mixed – of course there are always interesting tasks but they remained overshadowed by all those "need to be immediately done" things that were never that important.
After 2/3 founders left, the changes that were already felt were suddenly openly communicated – the trust, friendliness, respect and empathy were gone as everyone was left with the one founder who does not care about people and is highly incompetent when it came to managing the company he founded. As he was more interested in calling himself CEO than actually living up to the (very fair) expectations of a CEO, he blamed everyone of poor performance and wanted the whole workforce to return to the office since he was unable to accept that people working remotely was not the issue. He has never had any trust from his employees but thought of himself as the greatest leader to have ever lived. Employees started smiling in the front but stabbing each other in the back as a coping mechanism. The wrong people were promoted with questionable boni while others had to fear for their job due to financial issues that were constantly the main problem. Last but not least, they let go every single lead who once worked in the department of the founder who left due to interpersonal conflicts among the founders – quite obvious and ruthless behaviour.