29 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innenkununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
29 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 4,0 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
29 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 4,0 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
I have decided to leave the institution as my dissatisfaction has significantly increased over time, and the disappointment with the prevailing conditions has become overwhelming.
In particular, the negative work atmosphere and the strong sense of competition among colleagues have significantly influenced my decision. Additionally, I find it highly problematic that while most other universities offer extensive English-language programs, this institution remains stuck in outdated structures. As a result, it fails to recognize how it is becoming increasingly unattractive to both employees and students.
To enhance the university’s reputation and overall working and study environment, several key improvements should be considered. First, fostering a more cooperative and supportive work culture is essential. This can be achieved by reducing departmental competition through interdisciplinary projects and exchange formats, implementing mentoring programs for both staff and students, and encouraging teamwork rather than individualistic approaches.
Another crucial aspect is improving leadership culture. University leadership should actively contribute to a positive work environment rather than exacerbating internal tensions. Regular feedback sessions between employees and supervisors could help address concerns, while targeted leadership training on conflict management and effective communication would enhance managerial effectiveness.
Furthermore, the university must increase its flexibility and openness to change. Even minor adjustments, such as workplace arrangements, should not be hindered by excessive bureaucracy. A solution-oriented mindset should replace rigid administrative structures, and a dedicated platform where employees can propose and discuss improvements could foster a culture of continuous development.
Strengthening internationalization is another area that requires attention. The university should expand English-language services for both students and staff, offer language training programs to improve employees’ proficiency, and actively promote international collaborations and partnerships. A strong international presence is essential for attracting diverse talent and maintaining academic competitiveness.
In addition, the institution must prioritize innovation and professional development. Increased investments in training opportunities for employees would contribute to a more dynamic and skilled workforce. Faculty members should be encouraged to adopt modern teaching methods, and digital learning formats should be further developed to align with contemporary educational needs.
Finally, a more strategic allocation of resources is necessary to prevent budget cuts in crucial areas such as professional development and infrastructure. Investing in modern facilities and improved working conditions would significantly enhance the overall experience for both students and staff. Additionally, sustainability initiatives should be consistently implemented, ensuring that environmentally responsible practices, such as the use of recycled materials and energy-efficient buildings, become a standard part of university operations.
By implementing these measures, the university could significantly improve its internal atmosphere, global reputation, and overall effectiveness as an academic institution.
Significant challenge is the strong sense of competition between various departments, which hampers interdisciplinary exchange and cross-sector collaboration. As a result, there is a lack of cohesion and insufficient mutual support within the institution. Rather than fostering a cooperative working environment, an atmosphere of rivalry dominates, limiting opportunities for ambitious students and staff to achieve their goals.
The university no longer enjoys the strong reputation it once had, which aligns with my personal experience. An institution's image is largely shaped by factors such as academic excellence, research output, teaching quality, and the overall working and study environment. A negative reputation can, in the long run, impact its attractiveness to students, researchers, and potential collaborators.
Employees are neither excessively exploited nor required to work an unreasonable amount of overtime. The contractual working hours and the assigned workload are balanced and generally manageable.
The institution’s restrictive cost-cutting measures have also impacted this area. While professional development opportunities exist, I have had only limited experience with them.
Regulations are mostly fixed but allow for some degree of flexibility in certain areas. Overall, this can be considered acceptable.
Es wird darauf geachtet, nachhaltige Materialien wie recyceltes Papier zu verwenden
The interpersonal work environment at the institution is characterized by significant conflict potential. Both the way colleagues interact with one another and how they speak about each other are often marked by negativity and resentment. In particular, individuals with difficult personalities seem to find employment here, contributing to a toxic atmosphere that makes daily work increasingly burdensome. Constructive criticism or attempts to address grievances are typically met with defensiveness and excuses. There is a widespread reluctance to actively resolve issues or implement necessary changes. Neither problem-solving nor mediation appears to be a priority, as fundamental challenges are consistently ignored. Instead of fostering a reflective and solution-oriented approach to internal difficulties, the institutional culture seems to be shaped by indifference and superficiality.
The treatment of young/old employees or students in certain institutes is highly inadequate and falls short of the standards expected in a supportive academic environment.
My experience suggests that the supervisor shows little interest in actively engaging with the team or fostering a positive work environment. On the contrary, it appears that they significantly contribute to the problematic atmosphere within the institution, particularly by making negative remarks about colleagues. In conflict situations, the supervisor is neither supportive nor solution-oriented but instead appears indifferent. Rather than taking concrete actions to improve the work culture, they remain a great speaker without tangible results.
While the existing conditions are generally acceptable, implementing changes proves to be highly challenging. The institution demonstrates a lack of flexibility, even in minor adjustments, such as providing a different office chair.
A prevalent issue within the institution is the excessive number of meetings and discussions, which often fail to produce meaningful outcomes. Instead of fostering constructive problem-solving, these meetings primarily serve as platforms for departments to assign blame to one another. Consequently, structural issues remain unresolved, and there is a widespread reluctance among many employees to embrace change. Rather than implementing necessary reforms, discussions frequently result in empty rhetoric with no tangible progress.
Although salaries are regulated by the collective agreement for public sector employees (TV-L), strong negotiation skills can still result in better pay. However, this practice is problematic as it may lead to disparities in compensation.
A university always offers diverse and dynamic tasks, as well as engaging academic topics. Moreover, the academic environment provides opportunities to interact with interesting and inspiring individuals.
Vielfältige Einsatzbereiche
Mindestlohn für studis
Aufstiegsmöglichkeiten für Werkstudis als Anreiz
Das meiste - siehe oben :)
Um Fachpersonal für einen derart "entfernten" Standort anzuwerben, sollte man entsprechend arbeitnehmerfreundliche Angebote machen
Das Gehalt passt meistens... für ITler und Ingenieure ist es klar unterdurchschnittlich, für andere akademische Bereiche durchaus häufig auch überdurchschnittlich
Interessante Aufgaben, die eigenständig und flexibel gelöst werden können.
Befristete Verträge und teils unterdurschnittliche Gehälter.
Unbefristete Verträge für Wissenschaftler/Forschende. Keine 50%-Anstellungen (außer wenn von der/dem Mitarbeitenden gewünscht)
Flexible und effiziente Arbeit wird durch Home-Office ermöglicht.
Hier das große - alles übertönende - Manko: Die Karriereperspektiven für Forschende (bis auf Professoren natürlich) durch befristete Verträge leider sehr schlecht. Deswegen auch leider keine Weiterempfehlung..
In der Regel sehr gut - alle Sitzen im selben ("befristeten") Boot.
Auch hier sind mir keine negativen Vorkommnisse aufgefallen.
Einwandfrei (zumindest in meiner Abteilung/Arbeitsgruppe).
Räume und Computer sind OK, aber nicht immer zeitgemäß.
Viele Meetings, die leider nicht immer zu (vernünftigen) Ergebnissen führen.
Gehalt für Geisteswissenschaftler über dem Durchschnitt, für Ingenieure und Informatiker unter dem Durschnitt.
Mir sind jedenfalls keine negativen Vorkommnisse aufgefallen.
Durch abwechslungsreiche Forschungsprojekte gibt es eigtl. durchweg interessante Aufgaben, deren Lösung man zu großen.
Sehr viele Freiheiten für eigene Ideen.
Teilweise wird zu viel diskutiert und zu wenig gemacht.
Bessere Abstimmung der Abteilungen untereinander fordern.
Mitarbeiter sollten schon, wie sie andere Abteilungen mit fördern können.
Die Personalabteilung weigert sich, studentischen Mitarbeitern Urlaub zu gewähren.
Auch bereits vorhandenen Bachelor-Abschluss werden studentische Mitarbeiter gleich wie die Studenten ohne Abschluss bezahlt.
Man konnte nicht immer alle Projekte realisieren, da sich andere Abteilungen quer gestellt haben.
Freiheit der Mitarbeiter im Arbeitsumfeld
Die Umsetzung der Theorie in die Praxis
manchmal schneller und fortschrittlicher, auch flexibler zu Handeln
Flache Organisationsstruktur mit wenig hierarchischen Ebenen.
Zentrale Organe der Hochschule sind über laufende Projekte und deren Effizienz unzureichend informiert oder zeigen daran wenig Interesse.
Weiterführung von erfolgreichen Drittmittelprojekten. Mehr Nachhaltigkeit bei der Verwendung von öffentlichen Mitteln. Diese nicht nur abschöpfen, sondern als "Investitionszulage" sehen.
freundliche und hilfsbereite Mitarbeiter.
Mehr unbefristetete Stellen, klare Arbeitsperspektiven und Karrieremöglichkeiten, mehr Parkmöglichkeiten, größere Kantine (zu viele Studierenden), Sozialräume und Küchenecken für Mitarbeiter.
Zahlreiche interne Weiterbildungsangebote vorhanden. Eine Karriere kann man aber damit nicht machen.
halt öffentlicher Dienst (wenn man nicht verbeamtet ist)
Leider werden Erfolgreiche Projekte,
Überwiegend befristete Verträge, die durch öffentliche Fremdmittel finanziert werden. Übernahme erfolgt in den seltensten Fällen, obwohl Projekte sehr erfolgreich waren.
Führungsorgane der Hochschule machen teilweise nebulöse Versprechungen oder sind über Art, Umfang und Erfolge von Projekten überhaupt nicht informiert.
örtliche Lage
So verdient kununu Geld.