6 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innenkununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
6 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,8 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
6 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,8 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ich schaue ja jetzt immer noch drauf und schätze die schneller Anpassung an sich ändernde Markt-Gegebenheiten
Nix
--
Wir waren ein sehr kleines Team zum Start, dass gemeinsam nach vorne wollte
Durch Startup Crew und deren "Vergangenheit" direkt ein gutes Standing in der Branche
Startup halt da ist auch mal die eine andere Stunde mehr drin - dafür waren wir mittags oft zusammen essen
Wo kann man schneller und mehr lernen und wachsen als in einem Startup
Startup und Branche angepasst mit Benefits
So wie es sich gehört
Super alle haben an einem Strang gezogen
Auch hier alle auf augenhöhe
Super fordernd und fördernd - genau richtig
Zentrale Lage, gute Erreichbarkei,t leckere mittags variationen in laufweite
Super und super wichtig zum Start - jeder wusste über jedes / alles Bescheid
Alle auf augenhöhe
Definitiv 360° rundum Job, aber natürlich auch viel fleißarbeit zum Start
Hard working
Leadership tends to rely heavily on personal interpretations and preconceived notions, which are often misaligned with reality.
A more empathetic and open-minded approach would improve decision-making and team trust.
The working environment fosters an unhealthy sense of internal competition, where team members' individual performances are regularly compared at the end of each sprint. This often creates unnecessary stress and negatively impacts collaboration and team morale. I believe a more supportive evaluation method could significantly improve both productivity and overall satisfaction."
Flexibility, including remote work and vacation approvals, is disproportionately granted to senior employees, while newer employees experience cancellations and judgment. Persistent trust issues within teams make achieving genuine work-life balance difficult for recent hires.
Colleague cohesion suffers significantly due to frequent layoffs, especially affecting newer employees. Established colleagues tend to form close-knit groups aligned with management interests rather than offering genuine support. Although appearing helpful, they often engage in informal discussions leading to misunderstandings or negative perceptions of new employees, openly conducted in shared office spaces. This contributes to new employees eventually leaving or being laid off.
The relationship with long-standing colleagues can be challenging for new employees. Senior staff often form tight-knit groups and are more aligned with management, which can create barriers to open collaboration. Instead of acting as mentors, they sometimes behave more like gatekeepers gathering information, engaging in negative conversations, and contributing to an atmosphere where newer team members feel scrutinized and unwelcome.
Leadership judgments often reflect a fixed, narrow perspective established early on. While successes are overlooked, struggles are magnified. Efforts to offer clarification are subtly discouraged, resulting in a tense environment where employees feel constantly at risk.
Communication was challenging, as questions asked were frequently judged negatively or perceived as shortcomings rather than genuine efforts to learn. Due to high expectations and the fear of disappointing others, it often felt safer to solve problems independently rather than risk openly seeking help or clarification.
Challenging tasks that support growth are discouraged by time pressure from management, yet expected by the team—making development difficult.