6 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innenkununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
6 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,8 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
6 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,8 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
In my experience, disorganization was not an occasional issue but a defining feature of everyday work. Processes were improvised, documentation was inadequate or missing, and responsibilities were often unclear. I experienced staffing levels as insufficient for the workload, leaving little room for anything beyond keeping daily operations running. Junior employees in particular were given substantial responsibilities without the guidance, resources, or structure needed to handle them properly. The result was a working environment I found exhausting and unsustainable: employees were expected to compensate for organizational shortcomings rather than supported in doing their jobs.
The company’s external image did not match my experience as an employee. Behind that image, I encountered unclear responsibilities, improvised processes, and little meaningful support for professional development. In my view, the gap between presentation and everyday working conditions was substantial. I would have valued less emphasis on how the company appeared and more attention to how it actually operated. A convincing image cannot compensate for an exhausting employee experience.
In my experience, career development existed more as an expectation placed on employees than as something the company actively supported. I found no meaningful development framework, clear progression path, or transparent criteria for advancement. Decisions about promotions and recognition left me with the impression that personal favour mattered more than demonstrated performance. Asking for clarity or challenging established practices felt less like an opportunity to contribute and more like a risk to my own standing. For someone looking to grow professionally, I found the lack of transparency and constructive support deeply discouraging.
I found the salary mediocre, particularly given the workload and level of responsibility expected. Benefits were promised to me but never provided during my employment. That gap between what was offered and what I actually received undermined my trust in the company’s commitments. In my experience, the overall package was far more convincing in promises than in practice.
Sustainability featured prominently in the company’s external messaging, but in my experience, internal practices did not consistently live up to that image. The contrast left me unconvinced that the emphasis in its communication was matched by the same commitment in everyday operations. I would have found the message more credible if it had been reflected more consistently in practice.
Open communication was encouraged in principle, but my experience made that invitation feel hollow. On several occasions, when I raised concerns, I felt that the issues themselves were not adequately addressed and that the responses I received made constructive dialogue more difficult. This gave me the impression that disagreement with leadership was not always welcomed as an opportunity to improve. Over time, I became more reluctant to raise concerns openly—a disappointing outcome for a company that encouraged employees to do exactly that.
In my experience, the working conditions demanded far more from employees than the company provided in support. Heavy workloads were compounded by unclear responsibilities, inadequate documentation, and insufficient staffing. Employees were expected to keep things running without the structure or resources needed to do so sustainably. I found the environment exhausting: compensating for organizational shortcomings felt like part of the job, rather than a problem the company was addressing.
In my experience, communication lacked the clarity needed to work effectively. Responsibilities were often unclear, documentation was inadequate, and asking for clarification did not consistently lead to useful answers. Although openness was encouraged in principle, I felt that concerns were too often dismissed rather than constructively addressed. The result was a frustrating contradiction: employees were expected to take responsibility without being given clear direction, yet challenging that lack of clarity felt unwelcome.
In my experience, equal opportunities were neither a particular strength nor a notable concern. I have no specific positive or negative experiences to highlight in this area, so my assessment is neutral.
There are the typical challenges of a scale-up: things can sometimes be chaotic, leadership as well as many structures and processes still need to find their place. However, this has been recognized, and after a turbulent period, a lot is genuinely changing for the better.
There are demanding expectations but at the same time, everyone starts with a high level of trust, is given a lot of freedom and autonomy, and gets to work on exciting tasks.
A good overall package especially for a company of this size.
Tech can be improved - working within Co-Working Spaces is fun!
The combination of English as the company language and the core business and all employees being based in Germany can sometimes be challenging. However, there are many cultural initiatives, a culture core team, and the company places a strong emphasis on its core values.
Often, freundliche, fordernd und fördernd
Meistens gut
Gute Kultur
Ambitioniert
Immer
Tolle Chefs und super Konzept
Das Produkt ist noch nicht ganz eindeutig
Typisches Startup: es fehlt etwas Struktur und Personal