2 von 6 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innen(gefiltert)kununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
2 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,1 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
2 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,1 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Final Word
Working at POHA can be useful if you want to gain startup exposure and are willing to play politics quietly. But if you value integrity, transparency, and professional growth, this is not the place for you. Behind the branding is a toxic culture lacking accountability, structure, and genuine values.
Work Environment
Disorganization is the norm. Processes are ad hoc, documentation is poor or nonexistent, and roles are often unclear. Teams are understaffed and overburdened, leading to regular burnout and high turnover. Responsibilities are dumped without proper support or structure, especially onto junior employees.
Career Growth & Development
There are no meaningful career development structures in place. Promotions and recognition are arbitrary and often based on favoritism rather than performance. If you challenge the status quo or ask for clarity, you’re seen as a threat — not a contributor.
Sustainability & Greenwashing
The company’s “green” positioning is mostly surface-level. Much of the sustainability narrative is inflated for marketing purposes. Decisions around materials, partners, and operational practices often prioritize cost or convenience — not sustainability. Internally, there is little to no accountability around these claims. It’s greenwashing with a glossy website.
Culture & Leadership
Critical thinking, transparency, and open communication are not welcomed at POHA, despite claims to the contrary. Speaking up — even constructively — results in being sidelined, gaslighted, or bullied by leadership. Feedback loops are broken, and dissent is quietly punished. The leadership team favors blind compliance and internal politics over merit or contribution. Psychological safety simply does not exist.
Tolle Chefs und super Konzept
Das Produkt ist noch nicht ganz eindeutig
Typisches Startup: es fehlt etwas Struktur und Personal