23 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innenkununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
23 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,7 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.


kununu Prüfprozess
23 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,7 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
It all depends on the team and its leader. Some teams has a lot of fun at work. However, there are also teams where people are reluctant to come to the office to avoid their people.
If a normal working load of 50-60 h per week is Balanced.
Continuous learning and development opportunities are generally not provided in a structured or reliable way. While professional growth is sometimes mentioned, there is no clear or consistent framework that actively supports employee development.
Employees who show interest in expanding their skills beyond their current role or responsibility level are often met with vague responses such as “let’s see,” without any concrete follow-up or clear perspective. As a result, individual initiative does not necessarily lead to real development opportunities.
Overall, career growth and continuous learning feel more reactive than actively encouraged, which can be discouraging for employees who are motivated to develop their skills and take on new challenges.
The company offers some benefits, such as an Urban Sports Club membership and the Deutschland-Ticket, which are genuinely appreciated and add positive and nice value for employees.
The salary is acceptable overall; however, it tends to be on the lower end considering the level of time, effort, and commitment expected in the role. While the additional benefits help, they do not fully compensate for the workload and responsibility in terms of overall compensation.
It all depends on the team and its leader.
There is strong KPI pressure within the company to present figures in an attractive way for potential investors. In principle, this is understandable and reasonable to a certain extent. However, the way KPI meetings are conducted is problematic. These meetings are often strongly focused on negative aspects, with mistakes and failures being highlighted, while positive developments or achievements receive less attention.
In addition, some of the KPIs appear to be set at a level that is hardly achievable in practice, which creates additional pressure and frustration within the team.
Instead of motivating the team and creating incentives to perform at their best, the discussions are frequently driven by pressure and criticism. Employees sometimes feel that the focus is solely on results, regardless of how they are achieved.
Rather than collaboratively exploring new approaches to improve efficiency or support the team, the emphasis is often on questioning why a week did not go well. This can be demotivating and makes constructive collaboration more difficult.
Transparency and communication are promoted here on a large scale. However, if you communicate your opinion and suggestions for improvement, you quickly find yourself out of a job. In addition, a large part of the workforce was laid off without warning due to a “reorganization.” The team had no opportunity to prepare or adjust to this. In the office, the leads and bosses still greeted people warmly with “Glad you're here” and “Nice to see you.” as nothing happened and everything is fine. At the same time, termination letters were already being sent out to employees on a large scale. Unaware of this, people opened their mailboxes after their shift and read their termination letters.
The company also hires international employees, such as students or newly immigrated professionals. At first glance, this is a positive and commendable approach, as it supports diversity and international integration.
However, there are situations in which these employees appear to be at a disadvantage, partly because they may be more dependent on the company or not yet fully familiar with German labor regulations and workplace standards.
As a result, they sometimes accept requirements or expectations that is not always be entirely clear or transparent. From the perspective of some German-born colleagues, this can be perceived as challenging and raises concerns about fairness and equal treatment within the team.
- I like HR department before
- Respect your employees and don't micromanage.
- Promote the right person
People on leader level are very passive aggressive and often makes inappropriate comments on others' work
Expected to work all week to get best performance
Colleagues are actually nice, but some mid level are given too much power and they act like they own every team
Definitely not well. They try to sabotage new colleagues' work to appear "helpful" to bosses
No clear communication at all
minimum wages in the industry. very questionable commission calculation.
no such things as flat hierarchy here
Ich muss sagen, ich bin tief beeindruckt von der Fähigkeit meines Arbeitgebers, im Vorstellungsgespräch so überzeugend zu lügen.
Es wirkt, als hätte mein Arbeitgeber keinerlei Ahnung davon, was Respekt gegenüber Angestellten bedeutet.
Mein Arbeitgeber sollte sich lieber jemanden holen, der wirklich weiß, wie man führt – anstatt weiterhin so planlos und überheblich alles selbst zu machen.
Das Büro an sich ist durchaus in Ordnung – nur leider fehlt oft die Zeit oder die Stimmung, es auch wirklich zu schätzen.
Nach außen hin wirkt das Produktimage unseres Unternehmens sehr professionell – aber eben nur nach außen.
Wenn du der Meinung bist, dass mehr als 60 Stunden Arbeit pro Woche noch im Einklang mit einer guten Work-Life-Balance stehen, solltest du vielleicht einen Arzt aufsuchen und dein Gehirn überprüfen lassen.
Mein Arbeitgeber hatte schon vor meinem Arbeitsbeginn keine Ahnung davon, wie man neue Mitarbeitende richtig einarbeitet – geschweige denn, wie man ihnen beibringt, die eigenen Produkte professionell zu verkaufen.
Mein Gehalt ist eigentlich in Ordnung, aber das Provisionssystem ist definitiv fragwürdig – deshalb habe ich nie ernsthaft damit gerechnet, kurzfristig viel Provision zu bekommen. Die Mitarbeiterbenefits sind zwar ganz nett, aber nur dann, wenn man überhaupt die Zeit hat, sie zu nutzen.
Wenn du der Meinung bist, dass es umweltfreundlich ist, den Mitarbeitern immer wieder lange Zugreisen für Geschäftsreisen aufzuerlegen, dann glaube ich, dass es einen guten Grund gibt, warum das Unternehmen keine Gewinne macht.
Die meisten Kollegen sind freundlich und hilfsbereit, weil sie wissen, dass du ohne ihre Hilfe nicht viel von den Vorgesetzten erwarten kannst. Wenn du sie nicht fragst, wirst du von deinem Chef keine Unterstützung oder Informationen bekommen.
„Obwohl es nicht viele Kollegen gibt, die älter sind als ich, ist das Verhältnis zwischen den jüngeren und älteren Kollegen insgesamt sehr gut. Das gilt für alle – mit Ausnahme deines Vorgesetzten.
Ich glaube, das Management unseres Unternehmens weiß nicht einmal, wie man das Wort ‚Management‘ richtig buchstabieren.
Vertraglich sind 40 Stunden pro Woche vereinbart. In Wahrheit arbeitet man oft 60 – und das wird vom Arbeitgeber nicht nur hingenommen, sondern als selbstverständlich angesehen.
Echte Kommunikation mit den Führungskräften? Fehlanzeige. Sie hören nicht zu, weil sie ohnehin nur ihre eigene Realität sehen wollen.
Die Unternehmenskultur ist grundsätzlich positiv – insbesondere, was den Umgang mit Minderheiten angeht. Diskriminierung wird hier absolut nicht toleriert, und in diesem Punkt leistet die Personalabteilung definitiv gute Arbeit. Leider sieht es in anderen Abteilungen, besonders im Vertrieb, ganz anders aus – dort herrscht oft völlige Planlosigkeit und Respektlosigkeit.
Wenn du gerne mit Menschen aus der Gastronomie arbeitest, ist dieser Job eigentlich sehr gut für dich. Aber hoffe, dass du gute Ergebnisse erzielst, sonst wirst du schnell gefeuert.
My experience with the HR team was good. Despite is a startup but HR team tries to build a holistic system for employees.
-Leadership lack of authenticity and empathy.
-New ideas and improvements are ignored.
-Lack of identification of performance measurements.
-Only 1 months of termination notification period, however managers are 3 months.
- more feedback channel
- no power play
- should improve management competence, no passive aggressive communication
- focus on trust building with employees
It really depends on which department, some teammates are supportive and relaxed, others, specially the older colleagues are respectless, they don't focus on solutions when something came out but pointing fingers and blaming, which is quite shocking.
Once they expected us to work from 8 hour day shift plus 4 hours more in the evening.
Also there is a 12.5% over-working threshold, only time exceed from are compensated.
On the other hand, most customers have zero clue or respects of private time. You will get messages or calls even at 10:00pm.
No such concept
Nicht so gut
The supervisors in general are chilled but the mid level have too much power and too little measurements to constrain them. One's relationship with managers is weighted more than his/her performance and ideas. Some departments have a good leader who thinks for them, others just care about personal fame and gain.
Entire Customer support team including SDR, and SEs, customer support and onboarding team are in the same side and it's often loud
Communication with colleagues are quite friendly and support, however, managers often have passive aggressive communication style. Things that are discussed often not realised. There is a sort of KOL culture going on, a few key colleagues' voices pronounce louder, other colleagues are not taken into account.
Little transparency and leadership lack of authenticity and trust.
Flat-hierarchy is a lie.
Die sehr flexiblen Arbeitszeiten als Werkstudent
Super locker und entgegenkommenden und deswegen sehr motivierend.
Die Zusammenarbeit mit den Vorgesetzten findet auf Augenhöhe statt – respektvoll, offen und wertschätzend.
career path is clear and motived
nothing
the company probably send feedback faster for candidates
So verdient kununu Geld.