6 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innenkununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
6 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 2,9 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
6 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 2,9 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Das Büro hat eine gute Lage
Die Führungskultur vermittelt den Eindruck von Arroganz und mangelnder Wertschätzung gegenüber belasteten Mitarbeitern. Statt Entwicklung, Coaching und Förderung stehen Druck und die Angst vor Konsequenzen im Vordergrund. Mitarbeiter haben eher das Gefühl, ersetzt oder entlassen zu werden, als die Chance zu erhalten, sich weiterzuentwickeln.
Ich halte die aktuelle Führungskraft für ungeeignet für die Managementposition. Aus meiner Sicht fehlen fachliche Kompetenz, inspirierende Führung sowie ein kooperativer Führungsstil. Die Zusammenarbeit wird überwiegend als anweisend und wenig unterstützend wahrgenommen. Mitarbeitende werden hauptsächlich unter Druck gesetzt, anstatt gefördert, motiviert und in ihrer Entwicklung unterstützt zu werden.
This was the best part of working at the company. You do get flexible time and can also cash in on your overtime by taking time off.
There is usually no budget for development or career progression (i.e. promotion); most people in leadership seem to have too little leadership experience to challenge and develop you properly.
You will find your people, usually bonding over how tough it is to work here.
Unprofessional, too personal at times, not able to differentiate between personal and professional relationships; this leads to strong favoritism. Usually not able to make decisions, or tough calls, and not supporting you neither in your career development nor during tricky situations you have to navigate due to the bad communication in the company.
The communication was during my time not good. Information would rarely trickle down into the teams; this made decision making quite challenging.
It is always the same people who get to do the interesting jobs with high exposure or a strong challenge, leaving you the boring or less popular tasks, even if you are desperate to develop.
Nobody cares where and when you work as long as you do the work. → High level of trust.
Do not just talk about AI. Use it yourself and gain experience. Everybody is talking about agentic AI and this company is barely using GenAI tools (except for image creation).
You get more tasks but no recognition. The standard answer is that the development has not yet happened to be promoted. However, the development seemed fine for more tasks.
Management decisions are highly intransparent. This might be due to fact that the C-Level is a little lost.
Modern working culture, flexible hours, remote work, cutting-edge topics, non-profit, and open-source projects.
Dependence on funding from Heilbronn
Treat your engineers with care - they have alternatives.
Avoid prioritizing cost-cutting as the primary goal of the company.
Instead, clearly define your purpose and commit fully to achieving it.
The atmosphere used to be dynamic, with great colleagues and a modern office. However, recent developments created an environment of insecurity, with little clarity about the organization's future or performance expectations.
Externally, the organization struggles to communicate its purpose, leaving people confused about its work. In my opinion, recent personnel changes have further damaged its reputation.
Work-life balance is excellent, with flexible hours and the option for remote work, including "workations" abroad for up to three months.
There is a training budget and I learned a lot here. However, the lack of long-term engineering projects limits career development for engineers significantly.
Salary is decent for a non-profit with good work-life balance, though way lower than what you get in big tech. Basic perks like EGYM, a job ticket, and snacks are offered.
As a non-profit, the organization aims for societal benefit. Unfortunately, the focus on “Trustworthy AI” is vague, it remains unclear what exactly that means or how one would build such AI systems.
My team was exceptional, and most colleagues were supportive and collaborative.
Few senior professionals are present, which limits opportunities to learn from experienced colleagues.
Management consistently makes top-down decisions, pushing through changes without notice or regard for employee feedback. Important inquiries to the management level repeatedly went unanswered. Management's actions rarely align with their words, and the organization lacks strategic focus.
Flexible working hours and locations are a plus, but collaboration suffers due to the largely remote setup. The hardware provided recently is insufficient for engineers, and GPU compute resources are ridiculous for an AI company.
Communication is one-sided and largely irrelevant to employees' actual work. Monthly updates focus on self-promotion and vanity metrics, while, in my opinion, important strategic issues seem to be getting overlooked.
While I worked on cutting-edge ML methods, management showed little interest in these efforts. The focus is skewed toward politics, governance, and creating polished presentations rather than driving real engineering or innovation.
Es ist schwierig, Organisationen zu finden, in denen man an interessanten AI-Aufgaben arbeiten kann und die einen Schwerpunkt auf eine gute soziale Wirkung legen. Dies ist beim appledAI Institute der Fall. In Kombination mit den tollen Menschen, die hier arbeiten, ist es ein großartiger Arbeitgeber.
Obwohl es immer viel zu tun gibt, werden die Grundlagen der Work-Life-Balance respektiert: Urlaub kann jederzeit genommen werden, es herrscht eine ergebnisorientierte Kultur mit Flexibilität bei der Anpassung von Zeitplänen. Es gibt viel Verständnis und Respekt für Mitarbeiter mit Betreuungsaufgaben zu Hause
Die Gehälter liegen über dem Durchschnitt, insbesondere für ein non-profit Unternehmen dieser Größe.
Es gibt nicht viele ältere (keine?) Kollegen.
New non for profit company, so it is currently a bit start-up spirit where all topics and structures have to be built. Nice colleagues and also nice interactions with the parent company
The company is still small but learning is at the core
being a bit above market average is good for open source
Trustworthy and ethical AI in focus
can't really judge because most people are young
flexible working from home
Can be improved in terms of finishing the set-up between the parent company. People are always nice and approachable
The company mission of creating open source knowledge and tools is really unique