5 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innenkununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
5 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 1,2 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
5 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 1,2 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Sodexo
Es wäre wünschenswert, wenn private Situationen im Unternehmen respektvoll behandelt und nicht gegen Mitarbeiter verwendet würden.
Leider gibt es keine langfristigen Investitionen in die Mitarbeiter.
Das Management aus der Zentrale sollte nicht nur Plätze besetzen, sondern die deutsche Marktsituation wirklich verstehen.
Die Atmosphäre ist immer druckvoll.
Das Unternehmen bietet keine Perspektive für eine lange Laufbahn. Es empfiehlt sich, nach 2–4 Jahren Berufserfahrung den nächsten Schritt in Richtung eines größeren Unternehmens zu planen.
Das Gehalt ist lediglich so bemessen, dass es in Deutschland zum Leben ausreicht.
Zum Glück gibt es noch gute Mitarbeiter, dadurch macht die Arbeit Freude.
Die Kommunikation mit dem Management fehlt völlig. Die Personalabteilung ist vom in Deutschland üblichen HR-Stil meilenweit entfernt.
N/A
The company seemed to struggle with onboarding and providing structured training, despite placing employees in highly demanding client situations. When issues arose, there appeared to be very limited internal communication or willingness to clarify circumstances collaboratively. Instead, responsibility was addressed in a rather one-sided way, without much room for discussion or support, even for newer employees still adapting to the role.
More broadly, the internal management culture and client-related office dynamics often felt difficult to navigate. Given the high turnover and instability, it sometimes raised the question of whether there was a genuine long-term intention to retain employees. This could be especially challenging for international employees who also face additional visa and relocation-related pressures.
Colleagues are generally kind, but the atmosphere often felt unusually careful and restrained. You could sometimes sense that certain people preferred to stay quiet rather than speak too openly, which created a somewhat uncomfortable dynamic.
There appeared to be a noticeable lack of confidence internally regarding the company’s future direction.
Certain client accounts were extremely demanding, and expectations could extend well beyond regular working hours depending on the team structure.
Professional development support felt largely absent.
Salary and benefits felt underwhelming given the level of pressure involved in the role.
Nothing particularly noticeable in this area.
The team was struggling with high turnover and a very chaotic environment when I joined. Although the team lead tried to support the team, the underlying issues seemed far beyond their control.
Shortly after I joined, the organization went through significant restructuring, accompanied by a visible turnover of more senior employees.
During difficult situations, communication and support from upper management often felt noticeably one-sided. Responsibility appeared to flow downward quickly, while accountability at higher levels remained less visible.
Working conditions were acceptable overall, though not particularly exceptional.
Communication from upper management lacked transparency, and responsibilities were often poorly defined. This created an environment of constant uncertainty.
Among colleagues, interactions were generally respectful and supportive. However, this sense of equality felt far less visible at the management level.
The work itself was fine overall, at least on paper.
Lack of clear communication, unnecessary stress, no work expectations and minimal support for professional development.