24 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innenkununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
24 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,6 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
24 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,6 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
I have been at KI performance for several years and since that time i have developed my knowledge and experience further.
However not all former colleagues have experienced the same. Before you read some of the earlier negative comments, here is an objective overview from someone working hard to upskill themselves and blocking the noise around them.
KI performance is a Data - AI consultancy. We are lucky enough to be one of the few niche consultancies to have access to modern technology within the DACH region and be a trusted partner of both Microsoft and Databricks + Clickhouse. ( i would know as i have interviewed myself with other consultancies that do not stack up to the type of projects we have)
my colleagues are upskilled and certified on all courses that are necessary to add value to their projects. These certifications are paid for by the company.
Career growth and seniority is not measured by years of experience but by how well you are able to add value and knowledge to your projects and build something the customer actually wants.
With the emergence of AI and like other consultancies, if you are not able to prove that you can execute on the project then it is hard to level up your salary.
If one does their due diligence, one can see previous alumni of KI performance / KI group on Linkedin with titles such as:
- Managing Director at an Ecommerce giant
- Head of Product at a Unicorn
- Assistant to Board Director at a Mobility Enterprise
- Resident Architect at a Tech Vendor... and more
Each of these people have gained valuable experience at KI performance and alot of our tech people have left for our clients which reinforces the relationships we have with them.
Therefore the company provides a platform in order to work with and network with skilled professionals.
Pay Transparency
Sehr entspannt und angenehm
Absolut top
Super nette Kollegen, bei Problemen wird einem immer geholfen
Alle werden gleich behandelt, sofern ich das bisher mitbekommen habe
Total nett, konstruktiv und immer erreichbar
Alles wird zuverlässig kommuniziert
Nichts gegenteiliges mitbekommen
Sehr vielfältig und spannend
The colleagues and fun projects
Poor feedback culture, no appreciation of people's effort, very poor onboarding, poor project planning but high expectations and pressure to deliver.
Invest into your people and teams, create some vision for the company, create company culture where people want to belong to. Stop treating your employees just as another number!
When a new project starts or is about to come on board, the pressure is rather high.
Generally you are flexible in defining your day and where you work from, but there is still a pretty clear expectation for you to be at the office 3 days a week, does not matter whether it makes sense for your current project and set up or not
Does not exist
The colleagues are great and very helpful, some great people and professionals there. I really do not understand what they are doing there as they could have something so much better with their skills.
You are treated as someone they can fire or swap tomorrow
Poor feedback culture, focus on booked hours and delivered project scope, nothing else matters.
I learnt that even among my colleagues with the same role there were quite massive differences in salaries. So there is no transparency at all
Some projects were fun and you get to work with some interesting companies. However, how the projects are stuffed and planned is a pure disaster - important is to get work somehow done, patch holes here and there and send invoice to a customer.
The working atmosphere among colleagues is very positive, with a collaborative and supportive environment. My direct supervisor was an excellent mentor, providing guidance and constructive feedback that contributed significantly to my professional growth. The company offers interesting projects and finances professional certifications, such as Microsoft and Databricks, which help with career development. For employees who receive proper guidance, there are good opportunities for advancement. For fresh graduates or junior employees, this can be a good place to start a career.
Management tends to favor certain colleagues who interact closely with them, while others are often overlooked. Communication at the management level lacks transparency, and decision-making can be inconsistent. Work-life balance is limited, with frequent overtime that is neither compensated nor tracked. Salaries are below market average, and many corporate benefits are unavailable to most employees. Employees working on smaller projects often face limited resources and support, making it difficult to implement scalable solutions. The company also prioritizes bigger clients over smaller ones, which can result in neglected projects and limited guidance for the colleagues working on them. Additionally, being assigned to projects that allow for learning and growth often feels like a matter of luck. Everyone should have a fair chance to prove themselves and develop professionally, rather than relying on fortunate assignments.
The company could improve by involving technical staff in project planning and time estimation to ensure that deadlines are realistic. Communication and transparency between management and employees should be strengthened, and fair treatment should be extended to all colleagues, not just those who have closer interactions with management. Proper compensation or accounting for overtime would improve work-life balance. The company could also provide stronger support for colleagues in smaller clients and projects, and develop a clearer strategic plan to help the company grow and prevent negative consequences like those resulting from the 2024 layoffs. Also, when it comes to spending, the company invests in large parties after all-hands meetings. Instead of allocating resources to such activities, it would be more meaningful to focus on remaining competitive in the job market and retaining talent through fair and sustainable salary adjustments.
The working atmosphere among colleagues is very good. On an organizational level, however, too many unnecessary meetings significantly slowed down efficient work and solution implementation.
I do not think the company has a particularly strong reputation. Smaller clients were often neglected or received limited support, as priority was given to more important, bigger clients. Colleagues working on smaller projects frequently experienced little backing from the company. Additionally, the way staff were let go in 2024 continues to have negative consequences, which stemmed from the company’s lack of strategic planning. I would recommend reaching out to former KI employees and carefully considering your decision before applying, especially if you are planning to relocate to Germany. I have seen colleagues move across continents only to be dismissed during their probation period, which can be extremely difficult, particularly when adjusting to a new country without job security.
Work-life balance was effectively non-existent. Technical teams were excluded from project time estimations, and projects were assigned with unrealistic deadlines, which frequently required overtime work.
Career development and training opportunities were generally good for those who received guidance, such as the support I had from my manager. For colleagues working on smaller projects, however, limited time and resources often meant they were only able to patch existing solutions rather than implement scalable solutions following best practices. The company does finance certifications from providers such as Microsoft and Databricks.
While team cohesion among colleagues was good, this did not translate into a comparable sense of support or alignment when it came to management interactions.
My direct supervisor was supportive and acted as a strong mentor, offering constructive feedback and taking employee input seriously. This had a positive impact on my professional development. In contrast, other supervisors were largely part of the management level, with limited direct engagement.
Working conditions were unsatisfactory. Overtime was neither paid nor accounted for. Most corporate benefits were not very useful to employees.
Communication among colleagues was very good. In contrast, communication with the management level lacked genuine and open dialogue. For example, I was assigned to a project two weeks before my departure, yet the managing director who assigned me never spoke to me about it.
Salary was lower than the market average for comparable positions, and negotiating salary based on performance was difficult. During salary negotiation periods, the responsible managing director was often difficult to reach. As a result, some colleagues remained on the same salary for more than two years, while others received increases more frequently. Salary progression appeared to depend largely on visibility and individual relationships rather than consistent criteria.
Equal treatment was limited. The management circle tended to favor a few colleagues who actively interacted with them, while others were often overlooked. Some capable colleagues were unable to excel in their roles because management did not have a clear overview of individual contributions. When evaluating performance, they often consulted only one or two of these favored colleagues, which sometimes led to inaccurate conclusions. Lastly, many former colleagues, including myself, had not received a work certificate from the company even several months after leaving.
There were sometimes interesting topics and tasks. However, only a few of them could be implemented properly within the given timeframes. In addition, the company struggled at times to acquire new clients, which led to accepting projects with unusual or unsuitable tech stacks that went beyond the original job description.
Schlechter und schlechter nach 2024
Muss man keine Überstunden machen, aber die Arbeit schafft man nicht in 40 Stunden. Auch noch dazu nicht die Überstunden sind nicht vergütet
Vielleicht die tech Kollegen schon
Einer der GFs ist wie ein Geist, der versteckt sich immer
Keine zusätzlichen Vergünstigungen vorhanden
Sehr schlecht, auch sehr unklar
Gar kein Raum nach oben
Der Arbeitgeber lebt die rheinische Frohnatur und bleibt gleichzeitig sehr professionell. Der Umgang ist sehr angenehm und freundlich, familärer Zusammehanlt und eine angenehme Willkommenskultur wird hier an den Tag gelegt. Die Kollegen sind aus aller Welt und an persönlichem Austausch, sowie Kontakt, interessiert. Das dynamische Arbeitsumfeld sorgt für ein gute Arbeitsklima, alle wollen etwas erreichen und unterstützen sich wo es geht. Es gibt viele junge Kollegen, Wissen wird weitergegeben und hier wird Team-Work großgeschrieben und gelebt. Durch die spannenden Aufgabenbereiche lernt man jeden Tag etwas dazu und kann sich selber weiterentwickeln, vorallem in einem Fast-paced envrionment wie die KI Welt es ist.
- Plenty of room for initiative: Those who enjoy working independently will find many opportunities to take on responsibility and lead their own projects.
- Interesting and meaningful projects with creative freedom.
- Trust from higher management: You’re given responsibility early on and the freedom to drive things forward.
- Colleagues are motivated, friendly, and contribute to a nice day-to-day work environment.
- There is little structural and personal support from higher management, as they are overworked and rarely available.
- Recruitment partly follows a trial-and-error approach: even if a candidate is considered a good fit during the hiring process, this does not guarantee long-term employment. New employees are hired to test their suitability on the job, and if it doesn’t work out, the employment relationship is quickly terminated – leaving little planning security for those affected.
- HR has a strong company-centered focus: the emphasis is on administrative processes. Initiatives related to benefits or employee well-being are only implemented if they clearly benefit the company.
- The corporate culture is strongly business-driven, with little emphasis on long-term employee retention or loyalty.
- When leaving the company, flexibility is only granted if the employee forfeits pay – which highlights where the company’s priorities lie.
- Higher management oversees too many areas, which leads to overload and limited availability. Empowering senior team members to take on more leadership and decision-making responsibility could help distribute the workload more effectively and improve team support.
- Improve the hiring process to ensure that new employees are brought on with a clear intention to retain them long-term. Currently, there often seems to be a lack of clarity about what type of person is actually needed and why. A more thoughtful and strategic approach to recruitment would lead to better long-term fit and stability for both the company and employees.
- Align HR more strategically and people-oriented – not just administratively. HR should consider individual cases, advocate for employee well-being and satisfaction at work, and take an active role in creating a positive employee experience. This is essential for building long-term employee loyalty.
High flexibility in all kind of regards, e.g. working on-site vs. home office, shaping of own tasks, bringing forward own ideas and being able to drive improvements within the company
Still plenty of room to streamline internal workflows and increase efficiency outside of the daily project work
Great atmosphere, very nice offices
As flexible as it gets. Working times and office hours can be adjusted individually to a great extend, what I like a lot. Great Urban Sports conditions
Good relations among colleagues, probably also due to constantly changing team constellations
Average age is early 30s so there is not too much to say
Overall company goals could be a bit more realistic.
The offices are on point
Management communication has not been too transparent last year tbh, but after several complaints they adapted and established monthly company-wide all hands meetings, so this has improved a lot
Data and AI topics speak for themselves. Clients are from all industries, so the industry insights are broad. Work load is adequate I would say.
The atmosphere at KI performance is completely chaotic. Everything is urgent until the management just straight up ignores you for weeks and you realize the request wasn’t that urgent after all.
Below market pay, very hard to push for a raise since the company is always “struggling”.
No social initiatives within the company, no community work.
I don’t think that the managers acted on any feedback ever given to them. I understand that they are overloaded, but they also never tried to change anything. There’s always a feeling that the company is not doing well financially - but nothing is communicated to the employees. Every quarterly company meeting started with the same phrase “we completely changed our approach to clients and within the company”. After 3-4 of these it was just comical..
Amongst peers the communication was okay. But you never knew how long your colleagues were going to stay - a lot of people were fired each quarter. The ones who stay at this company for long are usually playing inside politics and can be really toxic.
Communication with management was a disaster. They always said to take ownership, but never enabled anybody to do so - and if you actually decided to do something independently, the reaction from them was usually extremely negative.
Colleagues are very supportive, fun, and easygoing. However, management operates in a typical consulting style—impersonal and transactional. You’re treated as just a number. I’ve never witnessed firing happen so easily; most employers avoid it, but here it happens frequently. They can change their mind at any moment and terminate you, especially during the probation period. It was the most stressful probation period of my life
Work-life balance can be decent during calm months, but once a project starts, it’s completely disregarded. Holidays are typically only possible during periods when there are no active projects
Most of the colleagues are great, but those who thrive in this company tend to be quite toxic
it's just poor
Communication was very unpleasant. The tech lead put a lot of pressure on me during the first six months, often making me feel like I was a poor-performing employee—but it turned out this was the same for everyone. The manager, surprisingly, was highly incompetent in communication. He didn’t say a single word to me on my last working day and actively avoided me during my final two weeks.
During the interview, they’ll emphasize how different they are from other consulting companies, claiming to build platforms from scratch and always choosing the best solutions for clients. In reality, that’s far from the truth. You’ll end up implementing heavy, unnecessary tech for clients who don’t need it or working on dull and repetitive tasks. There may be some decent tasks but it's less often.
So verdient kununu Geld.