Ihr Unternehmen?
Kein Logo hinterlegt
Mitarbeiter:innen-Zufriedenheit
- 3,7Gehalt/Benefits
- 3,5Image
- 3,7Karriere/Weiterbildung
- 3,6Arbeitsatmosphäre
- 2,8Kommunikation
- 4,3Kollegenzusammenhalt
- 3,6Work-Life-Balance
- 3,1Vorgesetztenverhalten
- 3,9Interessante Aufgaben
- 3,8Arbeitsbedingungen
- 4,0Umwelt-/Sozialbewusstsein
- 4,1Gleichberechtigung
- 4,6Umgang mit älteren Kollegen
Seit 2018 haben 24 Mitarbeiter:innen diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,5 bewertet. Dieser Wert ist niedriger als der Durchschnitt der Branche IT (4).
Alle Mitarbeiter:innen-Bewertungen ansehenBenefits
Die folgenden Benefits wurden am häufigsten in den Bewertungen von 24 Mitarbeiter:innen bestätigt.
Diensthandy- Flexible Arbeitszeiten
- Mitarbeiter-Events
- Homeoffice
- Gute Verkehrsanbindung
- Internetnutzung
- Rabatte
- Betriebliche Altersvorsorge
- Barrierefrei
- Coaching
- Hund erlaubt
- Gesundheits-Maßnahmen
- Mitarbeiter-Beteiligung
Arbeitgeber stellen sich vor
Anzeige
Was Mitarbeitende sagen
Was Mitarbeitende gut finden
I have been at KI performance for several years and since that time i have developed my knowledge and experience further.
However not all former colleagues have experienced the same. Before you read some of the earlier negative comments, here is an objective overview from someone working hard to upskill themselves and blocking the noise around them.
KI performance is a Data - AI consultancy. We are lucky enough to be one of the few niche consultancies to have access ...
Der Arbeitgeber lebt die rheinische Frohnatur und bleibt gleichzeitig sehr professionell. Der Umgang ist sehr angenehm und freundlich, familärer Zusammehanlt und eine angenehme Willkommenskultur wird hier an den Tag gelegt. Die Kollegen sind aus aller Welt und an persönlichem Austausch, sowie Kontakt, interessiert. Das dynamische Arbeitsumfeld sorgt für ein gute Arbeitsklima, alle wollen etwas erreichen und unterstützen sich wo es geht. Es gibt viele junge Kollegen, Wissen wird weitergegeben und hier wird Team-Work großgeschrieben und gelebt. Durch die spannenden Aufgabenbereiche ...
The working atmosphere among colleagues is very positive, with a collaborative and supportive environment. My direct supervisor was an excellent mentor, providing guidance and constructive feedback that contributed significantly to my professional growth. The company offers interesting projects and finances professional certifications, such as Microsoft and Databricks, which help with career development. For employees who receive proper guidance, there are good opportunities for advancement. For fresh graduates or junior employees, this can be a good place to start a career.
Was Mitarbeitende schlecht finden
Management tends to favor certain colleagues who interact closely with them, while others are often overlooked. Communication at the management level lacks transparency, and decision-making can be inconsistent. Work-life balance is limited, with frequent overtime that is neither compensated nor tracked. Salaries are below market average, and many corporate benefits are unavailable to most employees. Employees working on smaller projects often face limited resources and support, making it difficult to implement scalable solutions. The company also prioritizes bigger clients over ...
Poor feedback culture, no appreciation of people's effort, very poor onboarding, poor project planning but high expectations and pressure to deliver.
- There is little structural and personal support from higher management, as they are overworked and rarely available.
- Recruitment partly follows a trial-and-error approach: even if a candidate is considered a good fit during the hiring process, this does not guarantee long-term employment. New employees are hired to test their suitability on the job, and if it doesn’t work out, the employment relationship is quickly terminated – leaving little planning security for those affected.
- HR has a strong ...
Despite these positives, I observed several critical issues that detracted from my overall experience:
1. Lack of Strategic Clarity
From the outset, it became apparent that the company’s long-term strategy and goals were insufficiently defined, if at all. This lack of direction was particularly evident concerning my role. Despite friendly interactions with the managing director of KI Group and the directors of KI Performance, there was no clear vision for why I was hired or how my role fit into ...
Verbesserungsvorschläge
The company could improve by involving technical staff in project planning and time estimation to ensure that deadlines are realistic. Communication and transparency between management and employees should be strengthened, and fair treatment should be extended to all colleagues, not just those who have closer interactions with management. Proper compensation or accounting for overtime would improve work-life balance. The company could also provide stronger support for colleagues in smaller clients and projects, and develop a clearer strategic plan to help ...
Invest into your people and teams, create some vision for the company, create company culture where people want to belong to. Stop treating your employees just as another number!
Pay Transparency
Still plenty of room to streamline internal workflows and increase efficiency outside of the daily project work
- Higher management oversees too many areas, which leads to overload and limited availability. Empowering senior team members to take on more leadership and decision-making responsibility could help distribute the workload more effectively and improve team support.
- Improve the hiring process to ensure that new employees are brought on with a clear intention to retain them long-term. Currently, there often seems to be a lack of clarity about what type of person is actually needed and why. A more ...
Bester und schlechtester Faktor
Am besten bewertet: Umgang mit älteren Kollegen
4,6
Der am besten bewertete Faktor von KI performance ist Umgang mit älteren Kollegen mit 4,6 Punkten (basierend auf 3 Bewertungen).
Alle werden gleich behandelt, sofern ich das bisher mitbekommen habe
Average age is early 30s so there is not too much to say
I would say that the company is very young. Nevertheless, the experience of our older colleagues is highly valued and they are a great addition to the team.
Am schlechtesten bewertet: Kommunikation
2,8
Der am schlechtesten bewertete Faktor von KI performance ist Kommunikation mit 2,8 Punkten (basierend auf 12 Bewertungen).
Poor feedback culture, focus on booked hours and delivered project scope, nothing else matters.
Communication among colleagues was very good. In contrast, communication with the management level lacked genuine and open dialogue. For example, I was assigned to a project two weeks before my departure, yet the managing director who assigned me never spoke to me about it.
Lack of transparency, no alignment between leadership and even misleading statements. In the end, no reliable communication, as given statements can always change, also depending on who you talk to. My impression was that the management team said everything required to avoid discussions whether it was true or not. Employees often had to run after the decision-makers to get an answer, which was usually: “Let's postpone the topic”, resulting in a cycle of several weeks or months. Including running after ...
Amongst peers the communication was okay. But you never knew how long your colleagues were going to stay - a lot of people were fired each quarter. The ones who stay at this company for long are usually playing inside politics and can be really toxic.
Communication with management was a disaster. They always said to take ownership, but never enabled anybody to do so - and if you actually decided to do something independently, the reaction from them was ...
Karriere und Weiterbildung
Karriere/Weiterbildung
3,7
Karriere/Weiterbildung wird mit durchschnittlich 3,7 Punkten bewertet (basierend auf 4 Bewertungen).
Career development and training opportunities were generally good for those who received guidance, such as the support I had from my manager. For colleagues working on smaller projects, however, limited time and resources often meant they were only able to patch existing solutions rather than implement scalable solutions following best practices. The company does finance certifications from providers such as Microsoft and Databricks.
Not really possible.
Vielseitiges Angebot inkl. der Übernahme von Kosten von offiziellen Zertifizierungen.
Karriere, wenn wann macht was bestimmte Personen erwarten, darf man gerne mehr arbeiten. Weiterbildung/Schulungen?! Ja, wenn sie nicht kosten.
Fragen zu Bewertungen und Gehältern
- KI performance wird als Arbeitgeber von Mitarbeiter:innen und Bewerber:innen mit durchschnittlich 3,5 von 5 Punkten bewertet. In der Branche IT schneidet KI performance schlechter ab als der Durchschnitt (4 Punkte). Basierend auf den Bewertungen der letzten 2 Jahre würden 36% der Mitarbeiter:innen und Bewerber:innen KI performance als Arbeitgeber weiterempfehlen.
- Anhand von insgesamt 22 Bewertungen schätzen 59% ihr Gehalt und die Benefits als gut oder sehr gut ein.
- Basierend auf Daten aus 18 Kultur-Bewertungen betrachten die Mitarbeiter:innen die Unternehmenskultur bei KI performance als eher modern.
Puls
Aktuelle Stimmung
Noch keine Angaben in den letzten 4 Wochen.
Sei der/die Erste!
Jobs
Anzeige
Folgende Jobs könnten für dich interessant sein:
Awards
MatchMe
KI unterstützt
Finde heraus wie gut dieser Arbeitgeber zu dir passt.
- 🤝Führung & Kommunikation
- 📈Strategie & Mentalität
- 🧩Zusammenarbeit & Teamgeist
Gehälter
Unternehmenskultur
Traditionelle
Kultur
Kultur
Moderne
Kultur
Kultur
KI performance
Branchendurchschnitt: IT
Mitarbeiter:innen nehmen bei diesem Arbeitgeber vor allem diese Faktoren wahr: Kundenorientiert handeln und Spaß und Freude haben.
Die vier Dimensionen von Unternehmenskultur
JobFür mich
KI performance
Branchendurchschnitt: IT