112 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innenkununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
112 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 4,2 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
112 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 4,2 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Sehr flexible Arbeitszeiten, die man (wenn Unterricht verfügbar ist) frei wählen kann. Der Einstellungsprozess war relativ zügig und einfach.
Zeigen kein Interesse an den freiberuflichen Mitarbeitenden, obwohl diese eigentlich das Unternehmen im Gang halten.
Jedes Jahr den Stundenlohn steigen; am Ende des Jahres einen ordentlichen Bonus auszahlen; lanjährige Mitarbeiter extra belohnen und bezahlen. Für Notfälle eine Telefonverbindung zur Verfügung stellen, die immer erreichbar ist, da Unterricht ja auch am Wochenende stattfindet.
Man arbeitet ja nur online und lernt im wesentlichen nur die Schüler online kennen. Das ist meistens angenehm.
Sie können sich gut präsentieren.
Die Leitung ist nur daran interessiert, genug Geld zu verdienen.
Ab und zu ein Webinar. Düse sind hilfreich. Aber als ein einzigen Mal der Punkt Gehalt auf dem Programm stand, wurde dieser Punkt am Ende mit der Ausrede 'keine Zeit' abgewürgt und nie besprochen.
Man kennt so gut wie keine, aber bei den wenigen Webinars sind die meisten interessiert und freundlich. Manche unglaublich selbstbezogen.
Nie ein Dankeschön von der Leitung oder extra Bonus etc. Aber auch nicht schlechter als jüngere Kollegen.
Sehr schlecht. Auch nach vielen Jahren keine Gehaltserhöhung, keine Bonus am Ende des Jahres und keine Möglichkeit in Verbindung zu treten. Die Mitarbeitenden scheinen ihnen egal zu sein solange Profit gemacht wird.
Alles online, aber oft ist nicht genug Arbeit vorhanden. Wenn Probleme mit Verbindung oder den Online Webseiten besteht, bekommt man kaum Hilfe.
Teacher Support ist da, manchmal gut, manchmal ungenügend. Keine Direkte Verbindung möglich, nur durch Internet, auch in emergencies ist keine direkte Verbindung möglich.
Nur Basis Gehalt pro Stunde und nach bestimmter Stundenzahl 1; 1,5 oder 2 Euro extra, aber wenn man Inflation und steigende Preise mit einbezieht, hat man in Realität Jahr für Jahr weniger Kaufkraft.
Soweit ich weiss, sind alle gleichberechtigt.
Die Unterrichtsmaterialien sind interessant und vielseitig und die meisten sind gut einsetzbar. Manchmal wird viel zu viel Material in eine Stunde gelegt.
Immer entspannt
Sehr gute online Präsenz
Perfekt
Nicht wirklich Möglichkeiten
Leider nicht wirklich
Keine Anfahrt
Leider nicht viel Interaktion außer bei lingoda teacher Plattform
Kaum Interaktion
Können einem meistens weiterhelfen aber nicht viel Interaktion und Transparenz
Kann man selbst einrichten
Meistens schnelle Antwort
Ja
Ja, nur manchmal sind die Gruppen klein und es ist etwas un-dynamisch
Innovatives Unternehmen, man kann neue Ideen einbringen, sich weiterentwickeln, als Arbeitnehmer:in kostenlos an Sprachkursen teilnehmen etc.
nichts
Kollegial, supportiv, empathisch, auf Augenhöhe
spontane Arzttermine etc sind kein Problem, auch wenn Kinder krank sind, da ich immer im Homeoffice bin
Super, egal mit welchen Teams
Kollegial, supportiv, auf Augenhöhe
siehe oben
Ja
Die absolut flexible Arbeitszeit sowie die umgehende Unterstützung im Falle von Problemen, egal welcher Art. Die Zahlung erfolgt zuverlässig.
Aufgrund der hohen Anzahl von Freelancern ist das Stundenangebot, insbesondere von länger andauernden Kursen, aktuell etwas eingeschränkt.
Die Abläufe sind manchmal sehr chaotisch und abrupt. In solchen Fällen wäre es gut, etwas mehr Struktur zu haben.
Es gibt immer eine liebe und nette Umgang unter aller Kollegen, das schafft eine angenehme Atmosphäre und dauerhafte Harmonie.
Im letzten Jahr viel Fluktuation, es wird wenig bis nichts getan, um Mitarbeiter zu halten.
Weiterbildungs- und Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten anbieten.
Sehr flexible Arbeitszeiten, dafür auch extrem hoher workload und hohe Erwartungen an die Mitarbeiter.
Remote first, dafür aber kein Zuschuss zu Büroausstattung o.ä.
My experience relates to my department.
From day one, my onboarding consisted of back-to-back meetings, tool introductions, process walkthroughs, onboarding sessions, and countless introductory meetings across the organization. At the same time, I was expected to absorb a large amount of information while already contributing operationally.
Three weeks after I joined, the colleague who had previously shared the operational workload with the person onboarding me went on sick leave for approximately two and a half months. At the same time, the person responsible for my onboarding was leading a pilot project as part of her new role while gradually handing over her previous operational responsibilities to me. During my onboarding, I was also assigned an additional coordination-intensive area involving numerous manual processes and little room for error.
These were clearly exceptional circumstances. That is precisely why I chose not to judge them too quickly. I wanted to wait until my colleague returned and evaluate the role under more normal conditions. I never got that opportunity.
Despite repeatedly asking for opportunities to shadow experienced colleagues, this rarely happened. There were also periods without regular check-ins with the person responsible for my onboarding. I eventually had to ask my manager to introduce recurring check-ins because I often found myself working independently while still trying to learn the role. Documentation was frequently unavailable, outdated, or no longer reflected the current way of working.
The person responsible for my onboarding was also the colleague I worked with almost every day and whose opinion largely shaped the assessment of my performance. Critical feedback was rarely addressed directly. Instead, concerns were discussed internally first and communicated to me weeks later through my manager, often without concrete examples. In some cases, I learned from colleagues that I had allegedly been described as someone with poor comprehension or someone who made frequent mistakes before those concerns were ever discussed with me directly.
I do not dispute that I made mistakes during my onboarding. What I found difficult to understand was that several of those mistakes occurred in areas I had largely learned independently because opportunities for structured shadowing, repeated practice, and timely feedback had been limited. The mistakes themselves were never my main concern. The lack of opportunity to improve was.
I eventually raised this concern openly. I explained that I was becoming reluctant to ask questions because topics I had raised in good faith sometimes resurfaced weeks later as criticism rather than opportunities for discussion. Although I was told that questions were encouraged, my experience gradually suggested otherwise.
The most disappointing moment came after a week of bereavement leave following the sudden death of my father. I appreciated being granted the leave. On my first day back, I joined what I believed would be a routine check-in and was informed that my employment was being terminated. To the best of my recollection, there were no words of sympathy or condolences.
Ending employment during probation is a legitimate business decision and serves both sides. The timing and the way it was communicated remain the most disappointing professional experience of my career.
Fortunately, I know from previous experience that constructive feedback, structured onboarding, and good leadership do exist. That made it easier for me to put this experience into perspective.
My concern is for those who do not yet have that comparison. Early career experiences shape expectations. They also shape what people come to accept as normal.
high work load - The remote-first setup worked well.
I had limited interaction with most colleagues because everyone was managing their own workload. Despite that, my overall impression of the team was positive. One of my last responsibilities was organizing the team’s event after coordinating several last-minute changes. Ironically, it will take place after my departure. I hope everyone has a great time.
Leadership Principles were easy to find in presentations or wiki. I struggled to recognize them in everyday leadership.
Critical feedback was often delayed, indirect, and rarely supported by concrete examples.
Compensation was not a reason to join and did not reflect the level of responsibility and expectations placed on the role.
The role itself was interesting. Unfortunately, the onboarding experience overshadowed it.
Gehalt.
Sonst Nix.
Eher witzig finde ich, dass sie so viel Geld in die Hand nehmen um die Markt zu übernehmen, statt wirklich gut zu arbeiten und durch Leistung zu überzeugen.
Doppelmoral!
Da ist Hopfen und Malz verloren.
Es geht nur darum, die Investoren zu Befriedigen. - besser wäre, die Ziele, die man sich steckt auch wirklich zu bedienen und zu erreichen, statt nur so zu tun, als hätte man Interesse daran, sie zu erreichen.
Die Leistungen und Engagement der MA wirklich zu sehen und zu fördern, statt nur mit denen zu arbeiten, die die GF gerne mögen und befreundet sind.
Alle super pseudofreundlich und hip
Löchrig!
Jeder für sich selbst verantwortlich. Es interessiert ja zum Glück keinen
Niemand interessiert sich wirklich für MA. Sie werden schlecht verwaltet und die FK halten sich an keine MA-Gespräche, Förderung oder Ähnliches.
Gehalt ist überdurchschnittlich! Aber eher Schmerzensgeld
Tun so, als ob. Sehr clever!
Geht so
Unvergleichlich schlecht. Falsch, intrigant und pseudo-bescheiden. Doppel-Moral!
Alles der hip. Man kommt nicht dazu in Ruhe zu arbeiten.
Findet nicht statt oder es wird nicht die Wahrheit gesagt
Weihnachtsgeld oder Gratifikationen.
The flexibility, the culture, and honestly the product. Language learning connects people from all backgrounds and creates opportunities.
Nothing really "bad". Of course, there's always room to grow, but overall, this is a genuinely positive place to work.
There are still some minor process hiccups. The startup spirit shows here and there, but things have already improved a lot this year. More automation and streamlined workflows would make a big difference.
The atmosphere is excellent: collaborative, supportive and genuinely inspiring. Everyone pulls in the same direction and there's real room for growth. Hierarchies are flat and even the CXOs and VPs are still hands-on. Our founder and CEO might be the first one I've ever had who actually knows my name.
I think the word is starting to get out that this is a great place to work!
I work fully remote with flexible hours. If you need to go to a doctor's appointment or take a longer lunch break, you just let your team know. No problem yet. Nobody bothers you with "I don't want to disturb you, but…" emails after hours. People here are treated like adults, and that trust goes both ways.
Every employee has access to a dedicated learning budget. Personally, I'm in regular exchange with my manager about where I see myself and how I want to grow. We work on that together. If you perform well and take ownership of your growth, you can progress quite far here in a realistic time frame.
There’s always room for more, sure, but I earn well. There are also corporate benefits like pension funds, Urban Sports Club discounts, public transport subsidies for our colleagues in Berlin and various partner discounts.
Lingoda takes social responsibility seriously, not just in terms of education access, but also employee wellbeing. We work with nilo.health, which gives us access to mental health resources and webinars. The recent Nilo Health Week offered several great sessions on personal and professional wellbeing. Diversity, Equity & Inclusion are also actively promoted, not just talked about.
At least in my area, and even across departments, the collaboration is outstanding. Honestly, one of the best things about working at Lingoda. I enjoy being part of this team, as everyone is open, kind and incredibly supportive.
There aren't that many older colleagues, but those who are here are treated just like everyone else. And the ones who've been around for a while are super helpful and often share great insights and stories from the early days. :-D
No complaints at all. My manager and I are in close contact, and whenever I need support, I get it immediately. No question is too stupid, no idea too small. If something's missing, my manager takes care of it. You can speak openly here and I genuinely feel seen, heard and valued. At previous employers, I sometimes felt like I should be grateful just to have the job. Here, I've been told that they're glad to have me. That of course makes a difference.
For me, it's ideal: 100% remote. Of course, that requires discipline and self-organization, but the flexibility and freedom are worth it. I've never felt micromanaged or distrusted when working from home. It's a setup built on trust, and it works.
Communication works really well. We use Slack and all relevant updates are shared quickly across channels. There are regular company huddles and update calls that are actually efficient! No endless meetings with irrelevant information that could've been an email. Everything feels transparent and on equal footing.
We're a very international team. It doesn't matter where you're from, what your skin color, sexual orientation, gender identity or beliefs are, everyone is treated with the same respect. Also: There are also quite a few women in senior leadership roles.
In my team, we help international healthcare professionals build their future in Germany by improving their language skills. Honestly, I can hardly think of a more meaningful task than helping people move forward in their lives. But of course there is a routine and not every day is super adventurous.
So verdient kununu Geld.