148 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innenkununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
148 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 2,8 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
148 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 2,8 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Insgesamt ein guter Arbeitgeber mit vielfältigen Aufgabenbereichen und entsprechend unterschiedlichen Anforderungen und Qualifikationsleveln. Die Vergütung liegt aus meiner Sicht mindestens auf einem guten Durchschnittsniveau. Bei außertariflichen Verträgen werden Konditionen zudem individuell vereinbart. Unterschiede bei der Vergütung sind daher nicht zwangsläufig Ausdruck fehlender Gleichbehandlung oder Wertschätzung.
Natürlich unterscheiden sich auch Arbeitsbelastung und Aufgabenverteilung zwischen einzelnen Bereichen. Wo daraus dauerhaft echte Ungleichgewichte entstehen, sollte das Management genauer hinschauen und gegebenenfalls nachsteuern. Solange die jeweiligen Aufgaben jedoch zuverlässig erfüllt werden, lohnt es sich vielleicht, den Blick weniger auf andere Bereiche und stärker auf den eigenen Verantwortungsbereich und Beitrag zu richten.
Auch Selbstreflexion und persönliche Weiterentwicklung gehören aus meiner Sicht zum Berufsleben. Passende digitale Weiterbildungsmöglichkeiten gibt es genügend. Die digitale Arbeitswelt lässt sich schließlich für weit mehr nutzen als für als Musik- und Videostreaming.Verbesserungspotenzial gibt es in jedem Unternehmen. Gute Ideen sind willkommen und können über eine eigene digitale Plattform eingebracht und sogar honoriert werden. Veränderung beginnt jedoch nicht ausschließlich bei „den anderen“, sondern häufig auch beim eigenen Beitrag.Bevor man die Gründe für dauerhafte Unzufriedenheit ausschließlich bei Kollegen, Führungskräften, Strukturen oder der Vergütung anderer sucht, kann daher auch ein kritischer Blick auf die eigenen Erwartungen und Möglichkeiten hilfreich sein. Und wenn Aufgabe, Führung, Unternehmenskultur und persönliche Vorstellungen dauerhaft nicht mehr zusammenpassen, kann eine berufliche Neuorientierung letztlich eine ebenso konsequente wie sinnvolle Entscheidung sein.
Sehr bescheiden. Vorgesetzte lästert über jeden, arbeitet selbst gar nicht. Fliegt ständig ins Ausland zu Angehörigen, als Mitarbeiter selbst, darf man im Ausland aber komischerweise nicht arbeiten. Wichtige Kundentermine darf man auch alleine oder mit dem KAE bestreiten. Alles wird runter delegiert, sodass man zwei Jobs machen darf. Von einem Director hätte ich weit mehr erwartet. Aber mit Vitamin B kommt man selbst als Frau auf so eine Stelle und muss einfach nichts tun, während die Miatrbeiter rund um die Uhr arbeiten.
Selbst der Kunde macht sich über Mobis lustig. Regelmäßig kommt die Frage, ob man die Director auch kennenlernen darf. Nur der KAE ist präsent.
Mit so einem Management gleich null. Arbeiten im Urlaub ist Standard.
Nicht vorhanden. Fortbildungsmöglichkeiten sind nicht gegeben.
Für das was man ertragen muss, sind die Gehälter zumindest im Vertrieb zu klein.
?
War schon mal besser.
Umso länger die Mitarbeiter da sind desto mehr Geld verdienen sie.
Wie bereits beschrieben... Vorgesetzte macht täglich pünktlich um 15 Uhr Feierabend, Freitags sogar um 12 Uhr. Krankheit und Urlaub werden nicht respektiert. Es wird immer nur verlangt. Aber selbst tut sie nichts.
Schrecklich. Immer muss man in Angst leben seinen Job zu verlieren. Zumindest deutet die Chefin es immer an, dass man ggf. gefeuert wird.
Geredet wird viel. Aber die Arbeit bleibt beim 'working level' während das Management lieber um pünktlich 15 Uhr Feierabend macht.
Gibt es nicht. Es werden nur die Lieblinge bevorzugt.
Man dreht sich im Kreis und es wird immer das gleiche gemacht.
Nothing. Overall, this area of the company shows significant weaknesses in leadership, legal professionalism, employee support, and organisational culture in my personal view. For legal professionals, especially qualified lawyers, I would strongly recommend carefully evaluating the Legal and Compliance structure, leadership style, and internal culture before considering a position.standards expected from such a function. There appears to be a significant gap between the responsibilities of the department and the level of governance, legal expertise, and professional processes implemented. Career opportunities and positions appear, in some situations, to be influenced more by internal relationships, personal proximity, or alignment with certain individuals rather than by objective qualification and performance.
Employees with strong technical knowledge and genuine expertise receive little to no meaningful development. In particular, internationally hired Legal Counsels who bring valuable experience, including foreign legal qualifications and strong professional backgrounds, appear to be underutilised and insufficiently supported. The organisation does not seem to consistently recognise or develop the strongest legal talent available internally.
The leadership approach is another major concern in my view. Direct management provides very limited support, and after several years in the organisation it remains difficult to understand the practical contribution and responsibilities of certain managerial roles. There was limited involvement in employees’ professional matters, career development, HR topics, or operational challenges. Employees are often left to manage difficult situations independently without adequate leadership support.
The Legal&Compliance department is in my Personal view an absolute disaster. Basic legal concepts appear to be insufficiently understood by some individuals in senior positions within the team. I have rarely experienced such a significant gap between the expectations placed on a Legal & Compliance function and the actual level of legal expertise demonstrated in practice.
There is also an impression that some members of this Department present themselves as fullly qualified German Lawyers. This creates a concerning situation for a function that is expected to provide independent, reliable, and professional legal guidance to several Departments and the Management. Apart from the General Manager, no other member of this department holds a German license (is a fully quliafied German lawyer) to practice law.
Furthermore, Members do not have such a fully Germany qualified lawyer certificate but present themselves as “German lawyers,” despite having only studied business law. This represents a significant difference in qualification and professional standing.
The decision-making culture within the Legal function, including at senior management level, appears to me to be heavily influenced by personal dynamics rather than objective legal assessment. Decisions can sometimes feel driven by emotions, personal positioning, and the desire to maintain individual influence within the organisation rather than by a consistent professional evaluation of facts and risks.
This also creates a potential risk for the company itself. A Legal and Compliance function must be able to identify risks, challenge business decisions, and provide independent advice. When critical perspectives are discouraged or when internal dynamics influence professional judgement, the company may be exposed to unnecessary legal, compliance, and reputational risks - at least in my personal view.
The overall Legal and Compliance structure does not consistently reflect the standards expected from such a function in my view. There appears to be a significant gap between the responsibilities of the department and the level of governance, legal expertise, and professional processes implemented. Career opportunities and positions appear, in some situations, to be influenced more by internal relationships, personal proximity, or alignment with certain individuals rather than by objective qualification and performance.
Employees with strong technical knowledge and genuine expertise receive little to no meaningful development. In particular, internationally hired Legal Counsels who bring valuable experience, including foreign legal qualifications and strong professional backgrounds, appear to be underutilised and insufficiently supported. The organisation does not seem to consistently recognise or develop the strongest legal talent available internally in my view.
The leadership approach is in my personal view another major concern. Direct management provides very limited support, and after several years in the organisation it remains difficult to understand the practical contribution and responsibilities of certain managerial roles. There was limited involvement in employees’ professional matters, career development, HR topics, or operational challenges in my case. Employees are often left to manage difficult situations independently without adequate leadership. Managers leadership style also raises concerns. The impression is of a leadership approach with limited openness to criticism, where feedback or alternative viewpoints are not always welcomed. At times, the focus appears to be more on defending personal positions and maintaining authority than on creating an environment where employees can openly challenge decisions and contribute improvements.
In my personal view the treatment , including experiences of unfair handling, lack of support, and behaviour that can be perceived as inappropriate. A healthy Legal and Compliance function should set an example when it comes to fairness, respect, and professional conduct, yet the internal experience does not always reflect these principles.
In my view, the promotions were carried out in a questionable manner and were not based on appropriate qualifications. During my time with the company, I repeatedly observed that certain HR-related matters were not escalated further internally. These situations created concerns regarding transparency, independence, and appropriate governance.
Overall, the working environment feels highly disorganised, inconsistent, and professionally disappointing. The team atmosphere and management approach create an environment where strong professionals may struggle to develop or contribute effectively.
Processes e.g. HR and administrative structures also appear to have significant weaknesses to me. Responsibilities are sometimes unclear, processes are outsourced or handled inefficiently, and resulting issues can be attributed to employees rather than addressed at the organisational level. Even employment certificates contained inaccuracies, creating the impression that internal structures, responsibilities, and legal entities are not always clearly understood. In matters concerning my colleagues, more was done against me than for me.
The worst I have ever experienced
Not existing
Not really
Teamlead should do what korean coordinator say
Good
Too low salary in quality center
Good
Limited information for local employee
Korean Coordinators are not professional in quality center
Keine Zukunft. Keine Aufstiegsmöglichkeiten
In Kurse investieren. Mitarbeitern vertrauen. Genug Parkplätze zur Verfügung stellen
Zu Strikt mit Urlaubstage und Regeln
Flexible Arbeitszeiten, dass ich nicht lache. Jeden Tag von 8-17 richtig Familienfreundlich
Wird nicht gern gesehen
Jeder lästert über jeden. Wird vom Management auch so vorgelebt.
Es werden Lieblinge rausgesucht die können dann faul sein und der Rest bleibt bei anderen liegen.
Weil 0 Sterne nicht gehen. Schön dass in der heutigen Zeit dort immer noch Frauen mit bessere Qualifizierung schlechter bezahlt werden als Männer. Jede Frau verdient dort in gleicher Position mindestens 100€ weniger.
HR is super incompetent. If I was the ceo I would have reduced their salary by half.
You get to work on advanced technologies.
That you still pretend to care about the employees - at least you try.
All of the above points.
Maybe finally offer sexual harassment, racism, and sexism classes to ALL employees - not only an online questionaire which the managers aren’t even taking and no one is taking seriously. HR could read employees emails bout sexual harassment and actually respond instead of promoting said employee.
Verryyy Awkward
No one knows Mobis in Europe.
Please expect spontaneous mandatory meetings as late as 2am. Expectation of working more than 10 hours, clocking out and not getting reimbursed for your time. You will have to be available even on vacation or sick leave. If you are taking sick leave (even with a doctors note) please expect that they will presume you are faking it.
No option for any seminars unless you pay for them yourselves. Please note that there will be a lot of discussions with your superior if they even let you attend the seminars even if you paid for them yourself.
Only if you are not talking to an expat
Not if you are a woman. Men (in the company for <1year) will get promoted over more competent deserving colleagues (women) who have been in the company for more than 2 years - just an example - but you get the picture.
Unter aller kanone. Have never been so disappointed with a manager before. Different treatment based on your gender, race and sycophancy. If you are not saying yes to even the most stupidest requests (or even if you mention you did the task previously already if it’s still needed) then you are told that you are refusing work orders - even if it was just a comment or question about the task. Even if you mention that you are not responsible for a task and therefore cannot support in a task (different team responsibility) they will complain in your yearly achievement talk that you are refusing to comply with tasks from your managers.
Lot of noise - if you believe it’s okay to use headphones to drown out the noise - think again. It is considered not working properly even if without the headphones you cannot concentrate properly.
Wo?
If you expect normal wage please expect to be disappointed. If you are a woman, please expect to receive ~30% less than a male colleague of the same position.
Hahahahahahahahaha
Work itself (without Korean expats consideration) is fine and can be done - please don’t expect a great handover; you will have to teach yourself a lot, unless you can get support from some nice colleagues
Ohne worte
Schlimm
Null
The only good thing is flexible working hours, office facility.
Harassment is pretty much tolerated in the company. Their solution in preventing such things is passing a 5-minutes quiz on what's good and what's bad. Poor handling of this behavior. Although they might encourage people to bring up issues that occur in the work environment, they do not necessarily proceed to further condemn actions that might violate boundaries. Basically, perpetrators receive a carte blanche to continue their delinquent behavior.
I will not be surprised, if it will be another Ubisoft-like case after a couple of years.
There needs to be some serious improvements on protection of employees privacy. Whatever is considered confidential leaks like a ruptured pipe.
Biased.
Alright.
Great work-life balance due to flexible work hours. The remote work policy is not so suitable for parents with small children, though.
It is hard to move on the corporate ladder up due to established positions within departments. Often times, the system might appear sexist, because about 90% of managerial positions are occupied by men.
Overall, average.
Boundaries are violated.
Colleagues are encouraged to share personal data of their coworkers with the management.
Incompetent and unprofessional managing style.
The company is very conservative. It is quite difficult, if you also work with external partners: you will never receive access to the files that are essential for your performance. Poor IT support.
Poor communication from the management.
Strong presence of favoritism towards certain colleagues based on unexplainable criteria.
Crazy tasks with short deadlines and work under pressure. The management is proud of holding their personnel under great pressure and shares tales about that during corporate off-the-duty events.
So verdient kununu Geld.