36 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innenkununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
36 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,2 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.


kununu Prüfprozess
36 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,2 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Dysfunctional working atmosphere characterised by injustice and unfair treatment. Most of employees perceive that decisions regarding promotions, workload distribution, recognition, or disciplinary actions are made arbitrarily or based on favouritism rather than merit.
This perception had resulted in eroding psychological safety and trust in leadership. Individuals became reluctant to voice ideas or concerns, fearing retaliation or further inequitable treatment. Over time, morale declined, collaboration deteriorated, and informal networks replace formal processes as employees attempt to navigate perceived bias.
Bad image to customers
Inflexible Home Office conditions
Career and further education opportunities appeared limited, with insufficient support for professional development, training, or clear advancement pathways.
Medium pay for Munich conditions
Collaboration, mutual support, and trust among colleagues was weak and at most times even absent. Employees tend to work in isolation, communication between team members is limited and conflicts or competition often replace cooperation.
Dealing with older colleagues was sometimes challenging due to differences in perspectives, communication styles, and openness to new approaches. At times, these generational differences made collaboration and the adoption of new ideas more difficult, which occasionally affected team dynamics and efficiency.
My former supervisor often displayed behavior that I perceived as unfair and elitist. Certain individuals appeared to receive preferential treatment, while others were overlooked or treated dismissively. Decisions and opportunities were not always distributed in a transparent or merit-based manner, which created a sense of inequality within the team and negatively affected trust and morale.
Poor communication and inadequate information sharing created a work environment characterised by uncertainty, inefficiency, and mistrust. When essential information is inconsistently distributed, delayed, or selectively withheld, employees cannot make well-informed decisions or coordinate effectively with colleagues. This often resulted in duplicated work, avoidable errors, and frequent misunderstandings.
Favouring Koreans vs. other nationalities
No inspiration, execution only
Büroinfrastruktur.
Warum ich diese Bewertung schreibe :
Ich habe mich bewusst dazu entschieden, diese Bewertung öffentlich zu teilen, da ich während meiner Zeit bei Samsung Semiconductor Europe GmbH ernsthafte und wiederholt belastende Erfahrungen gemacht habe.
Diese Probleme wurden von mir intern – einschließlich der Personalabteilung und der Führungsebene – klar angesprochen, jedoch ohne spürbare Konsequenzen oder Veränderung.
Es fällt mir nicht leicht, dies öffentlich zu machen, aber ich halte es für notwendig, weil ich der Überzeugung bin, dass ein respektvolles und professionelles Arbeitsumfeld für alle Mitarbeitenden selbstverständlich sein sollte.
Diese Bewertung basiert ausschließlich auf meiner persönlichen Erfahrung, ist sorgfältig reflektiert und soll anderen helfen, informierte Entscheidungen zu treffen.
Zur Einordnung dieser Bewertung :
Die hier geschilderten Erfahrungen habe ich nicht nur persönlich erlebt, sondern auch bereits während meiner Anstellung offen und offiziell gegenüber der Personalabteilung, der Rechtsabteilung sowie der Geschäftsführung kommuniziert.
Diese Hinweise wurden damals schriftlich eingereicht und sind dokumentiert.
Nach meiner Kündigung habe ich ein qualifiziertes Arbeitszeugnis mit durchweg positiver Bewertung erhalten, das von der Leitung der Personalabteilung unterzeichnet wurde.
Ich teile meine Erfahrung hier nicht aus emotionaler Reaktion, sondern in der Überzeugung, dass ein transparenter Umgang mit problematischen Strukturen notwendig ist.
Sollte diese Bewertung beanstandet oder in Frage gestellt werden, bin ich in der Lage, die entsprechenden internen Vorgänge und Dokumente zur Einordnung beizubringen.
Aktive Beteiligung des Managements. Insgesamt habe ich das Arbeitsumfeld als dauerhaft belastend erlebt – geprägt von einem spürbaren Machtungleichgewicht und einer häufig wenig konstruktiven Kommunikation.
Leider habe ich während meiner Zeit bei Samsung Semiconductor Europe GmbH eine sehr herausfordernde Arbeitsatmosphäre erlebt.
Die interne Kommunikation war oft unklar, was zu unnötigen Missverständnissen und Spannungen im Team geführt hat.
Der Umgangston war in vielen Fällen wenig respektvoll, was langfristig dem Teamgeist schadet.
Konstruktives Feedback habe ich selten erlebt; stattdessen habe ich eine ausgeprägte Fehlerkultur wahrgenommen.
Verbesserungspotenzial sehe ich vor allem in der Führungskultur und im respektvollen Miteinander.
Obwohl Homeoffice offiziell erlaubt war, wurde es in der täglichen Praxis kaum akzeptiert und häufig mit Skepsis betrachtet – insbesondere von Vorgesetzten.
Ich habe die Teamkultur als geprägt von eingeschränktem Vertrauen, mangelnder Wertschätzung und abwertenden Kommentaren über nicht anwesende Kolleg:innen erlebt.
Ich hatte zeitweise den Eindruck, dass Fehler im Team auf eine Art kommuniziert wurden, die ich persönlich als wenig respektvoll und belastend empfunden habe.
Meiner Wahrnehmung nach entstand bei internen Veranstaltungen teilweise sozialer Druck – insbesondere hinsichtlich der Teilnahme und des Alkoholkonsums.
Mitarbeitende, die sich zurückhielten, hatten häufig das Gefühl, nicht vollständig dazuzugehören.
Ich hatte den Eindruck, dass es gelegentlich Bemerkungen gab, die in meinem persönlichen Empfinden über das beruflich Angemessene hinausgingen
Besonders problematisch war, dass ich mehrfach Aufgaben übernehmen musste, die aus meiner Sicht klar dem privaten Bereich einer Führungskraft zuzuordnen waren – darunter z. B. das Übersetzen privater Schreiben, das Vereinbaren nicht berufsbezogener Termine oder das Bestellen persönlicher Produkte.
Solche Tätigkeiten lagen deutlich außerhalb meiner beruflichen Rolle und wurden ohne Rücksprache eingefordert.
Very poor documentation at all levels.
Confusing instructions many time.. For namesake there is option to do 2 days/week home office but many manager do not allow employees take 2 days/week.
One suggestion for Korea HQ to have trust in other business units like Europe.
Long hierarchy chain. All decisions are made in Korea. People are holding big positions but effectiveness of their opinions is very very limited.
Management do not encourage open discussion.
Many time people from Munich and Korea office are not in sync. Team spirit is very low. Instead of working together in critical situation majority people have tendency to play blame game.
It's one big company but behaves like two individual entity(suppler(HQ) and client(Europe)).
Not managers are same. My experience is very bad.
Do not care about employee reputation.
Many people are very rude and do not have basic sense of corporate communication.
Horrible communication. Some managment people from HQ has very poor hold on English. So unfortunately they cannot express their opinion fully even if rarely they want to.
Hypocrisy is deep rooted in management.
Very monotonus job... no opportunity to grow other than your regular activity. People don't even roles and responsibility clearly.
Keep your employees fit, this will make them stick to you for a little bit longer... :)
Keep working to improve on the things highlighted above. Whatever you reply to my feedback it won't change the reality, only facts will change it. You will keep losing talents which you cannot find replacement for if you keep denying the truth!
Quite tightfisted when it comes to providing new office appliance; phone, computer, etc. The appliances are from Samsung they are cheap for you!
Depending on the team
They are trying to improve their image because many people are leaving, specially from the technical marketing side. What does it say from this team?
It's the most positive thing I see in Samsung with the paid gym, Jobrad... That doesn't mean compared to the USA brand they are way behind
they are trying hard to give training to their employees but thousands of approvals need to be accepted in order to have an expensive training or not related to the field.
Management is also being trained becase there are very few leaders in the company which have been given this position in order to keep them happy/promote them to something... without previous experience!
People are competing against each other and are not evaluated according their capabilities
Not many working in the branch besides for some positions of not very high importance
Secrecy on promotion, it used to be shared but they decided these days to keep it in secret.
Some positions are "made up" by HR to keep people happy with a title that only means something in paper
Paid breakfast, lunch, gym, etc. The food a the Aramark canteen is awful
No communication top-down
As explained above, the company disrespects it's employees by giving them worse conditions on moving to a new position compared to a new applicant external to Samsung
Very few women in high positions, besides the new head of HR which has been given hired in this position to prove a point?
These are only given to higher categories to feel that they are really doing something while the tasks sometimes could be done by a working student. It's their time to shine!
Good Brand Name
Strong cash flow
Poor management
Non-transparent organization
No information sharing
No fairness
No promotion for local people
Lucj of future vision
No strategy, no Market diversification
Traditional company, but no modern aspects
No trainings, no spending for courses
Poor management, feeling of personal ownership, unfair treatment
Information flows only from Top to bottom, highly non-transparent
Only if you are Korean
- opportunities to talk with colleagues/ superiors...
- working life
- free food/drinks offer
/
The '' Zeus '' system is full of information and can sometimes be tricky... at least in the beginning. Maybe a little bit more explanation to understand the system better would be great.
The colleagues in the team and also from other teams were always ready to help, full of advice and caring.
Even though i was on a 38hrs/week contract it was still very manageable to find a balance between my personal life and my work life. The schedules were flexible so i could manage my own time.
It is always a pleasure to work surrounded by people who are motivated.
Colleagues are treating the younger generation with much respect, and that is very much appreciated.
In the team where i was at, everybody was treated equally and treating the others the same way.
the workspace is great, spacious and welcoming!
The system allows you to know the email address of a colleague easily in simply typing name and surname and since most of the exchanges were through email, it resulted easy to communicate among us.
i've never experienced discrimination in the months where i was working
The tasks are usually repetitive (following a certain protocol), but that doesn't mean that it is uninteresting.
tolles modernes Büro
hybrides Arbeiten
flexible Arbeitszeiten
Eigenständigkeit
Gehalt & Soziallesitungen
Mentorenprogram
Teambuilding
zu viele interne Tools
Kommunikation/Transparenz
viel Eigenständigkeit wird angeboten, toller kollegialer Zusammenhalt
schon viel los und teilweise kurze Abgabetermine, aber lässt sich trotzdem gut mit der Familie vereinbaren
Weiterbildungskatalog ist vorhanden, Karrieremöglichkeiten durch die Größe etwas geringer, interne Versetzungen werden trotzdem unterstützt
durchschnittlich bzw. etwas höher als durchschnittlich für die Branche, dafür gute Sozialleistungen
viel Zusammenarbeit, nette Kolleg:innen
teilweise HQ-zentrisch, wie aber auch in allen multinationalen Konzernen
Willkommenskultur, unsere Abteilung ist divers (Alter, Geschlecht, Werdegang)
die Verantworung ist klar, genug Spielraum
lack of forward-looking vision with respect to human resources' management; lack of wfh real understanding and serious discrimination complaints from employees left unaddressed by HR.
transparency, recycling, gender pay gap, wfh
generally it is ok if your line manager is not Korean; Korean line managers in specific departments tend on insisting on one not hanging out with non-koreans and having a very hierarchical (at the verge of micromanagement and rude) attitude. they publicly insult you and threat to fire you if you do not comply with their understanding of the workplace. I am not talking about how you do your job, rather how you are expected to conceive working at samsung.
Work from Home is highly discouraged and there exists and social pressure to be present in the office (that was the case also during the pandemic). The firm is not to allow WFH anymore now that Bavarian regulations have been lifted.
depends on your (i) role (sales v non-sales; career level: established manager/vp) (ii) gender. there is little to none transparency as to how HR makes salary offer and evaluation (or, if any guidelines apply). this impact on your entire progression in the company.
no recycling whatsoever.
as mentioned, depends on the team. Korean v non-korean supervisor makes a lot of a difference
They serve you breakfast and pay for your meal. which is very good. the WFH policy however is very bad and outdated
see previous comments. less respectful in Korean.
well.. there is a general feeling that women are paid less than men. Also, unless you serve as a manager and-or sales person, your salary is hardly competitive.
Homeoffice policy is a joke
Sometimes long approval ways and long processes
So verdient kununu Geld.