54 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innenkununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
54 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 2,8 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
54 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 2,8 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ich wurde nach einem langwierigen Einstellungsprozess für eine Festanstellung als Steuerberater eingestellt. Die Stelle war bereits seit mehreren Monaten vakant.
Ich habe meinen Vertrag am 17. Juni 2026 unterschrieben und am 1. Juli angefangen. Weniger als vier Wochen später, am 27. Juli, wurde mir mitgeteilt, dass mein Arbeitsverhältnis aufgrund organisatorischer und wirtschaftlicher Veränderungen im Finanzbereich gekündigt werden würde.
Ich war zu diesem Zeitpunkt arbeitslos und hatte andere Rekrutierungsprozesse im Gange, die ich eingestellt habe, nachdem ich das Angebot von Canadian Solar angenommen hatte.
Ich kann nicht wissen, welche interne Planung es vor meiner Einstellung gab. Aufgrund meiner Erfahrung halte ich die Rekrutierung und Personalplanung des Unternehmens jedoch für höchst unzuverlässig. Wenn eine Stelle seit Monaten unbesetzt ist, sollte der langfristige Bedarf daran sorgfältig abgewogen werden, bevor jemand dauerhaft eingestellt wird.
Ein unbefristeten Angebot sollte mehr als vier Wochen Beschäftigung bedeuten.
Toxic Spanisch Work Environment
No
Unhealthy
No
No
No
Zero. International partiality
No
Zero
No
Zero Knowledge
No
No
Work-Life Balanace
Die Spitze Ändern und eine Klare Strategiemanager ins Haus Bringen
Strategieloses Handeln, undurchdachte Vorgehensweise, hire-fire Mentalität
HR mit etwas mehr Hirn betreiben
The company made an effort to promote an open feedback culture, which is commendable in principle, although it was not always successfully implemented in practice. Everyone is fearing for their job or being judged on a personal level, not on a professional one. Additionally on the positive side, the teams were generally very supportive and collegial, and the international environment made for an interesting and diverse workplace experience.
The company’s management culture was toxic, with favoritism and personal connections overshadowing merit and performance. Career growth was limited to those within management circles, and extremely high turnover resulted from leadership issues, not employee performance. Management remained largely unchanged, while lower-level employees were constantly replaced. While teams were supportive, poor business decisions and unprofessional behavior, such as shouting, micromanagement or an upper management who struggled to meet the expectation of their role consistently, hurt morale. Nice try!
Genuinely listen to employees and show appreciation for those who are committed to the company's success. Foster open, sincere communication and create a true culture of trust and respect. Focus on making strategic business decisions based on facts and broader input, rather than relying on the influence of toxic management figures. Address unprofessional behavior, such as shouting ("Business excellence"!), which often signals deeper issues, rather than ignoring or rewarding it.
The work environment was toxic, with a culture that often rewarded poor behavior. In contrast, high-performing employees who contributed positively to team dynamics were often overlooked or even let go.
Even clients were aware of the internal management issues, which negatively impacted the company's reputation
I was struck by the company’s limited flexibility regarding part-time work. Despite requests, even new parents were not granted reduced hours, highlighting a lack of support for work-life balance and family needs.
Career advancement opportunities were extremely limited and largely reserved for those who had longstanding ties within management circles, often requiring many years of internal networking rather than performance-based progression. Rather than addressing issues within management, the company often chose to rapidly replace employees, missing opportunities to improve leadership practices and retain valuable talent.
The salary and social security benefits were fair and competitive. However, there was little to no opportunity for salary development, even after many years of service and consistently strong performance.
Given the company's involvement in the renewable energy sector, one would expect a stronger commitment to environmental responsibility. However, there was little innovation or genuine effort to create an environmentally friendly or socially responsible workplace. A lot of talk, but very little follow-through.
The immediate team was composed of talented, supportive colleagues who made daily work enjoyable. Unfortunately, poor management decisions and a lack of genuine support from leadership frequently undermined team cohesion and morale, leading to high turnover and instability.
There were very few older colleagues in the workplace, so I cannot speak to how they were treated or integrated within the team.
Recognition was typically reserved for a small, tight-knit group within upper management, making career progression feel political rather than merit-based, hence management is not very good at their job, but very much liked by the upper management (personally, not professionally).
The working conditions were adequate but not particularly outstanding.
Communication was predominantly top-down, despite claims of an open feedback culture. Employees who expressed differing perspectives from management often faced subtle retaliation and personal bias, rather than constructive engagement.
Performance and merit were often overshadowed by favoritism within leadership circles, limiting fair access to opportunities for growth and advancement.
There is potential for engaging and meaningful work; however, it is often limited by poor management and a lack of strategic direction.
Inappropriately qualified people are employed in the respective departments, qualified employees are sent out literally due to racial discrimination.
Top!
In meiner Erfahrung sehr gut
Sei es mit HR, die Führungskraft oder die Geschäftsführung. Man kann mit jedermann offen reden.
Currently nothing, just surviving
Human Resources give out “exit interviews” - no one will tell you the truth.
Too much fear, insecurity..people are scared and trying to survive, just with that poor Leadership nothing will change. More and more people will leave the company- including myself. I’m already applying for a new job.
Change of Management Team , toxic colleagues need to change or to leave company
Onboarding process is great; just with the time you notice:
- Dismissive behaviour
- Gaslighting
- Five star employees at the company (cliques)
A particular group of toxic employees that lunches, grabs coffee, and organizes happy hours together (local Management loves that - part of the team)
- colleagues leaving, cloack-and-dagger operations
scared I'll be next
- HR is not able to change anything in the company to help employees (Lack of Power)
CSI still has a good external image, as employee I would rate just 1 star
Not really
- a lot of co-workers spreads rumours to distract from own weakness (backup situations)
- 24/7 you need to be reachable
- Artificial Happiness Teamevents
and forced to attend
Not so much older people
- Passive-aggressive teamleader (Bossing)
- Lack of Leadership
- Different employees receive different messages
Office is nice
- no clear communication
- Constant “off-hours” communication
Interesting topics, just low motivation
International character makes the working atmosphere unique and interesting, the fun factor is given. Flat hierarchies are very helpful in the day-to-day business.
relaxed and very international atmosphere, nice informal get-together activities for employees offered by the company, mix of young people and people who are working since many years for the company
flexible working hours to balance work and life
for medium sized company great
green company
colleagues are helping each other to find quick solutions
open for own ideas
nice new office
open communication culture
absolutely, for instance about 50% female employee rate
Diversity and inclusivity is part of the culture and this makes this a fun place to work. Management are very approachable and the hierarchy is relatively flat.
The culture is informal and friendly, both within teams and across departments. The business language is English, but many many other languages are used due to the diverse workforce and customer base.
People work hard but flexible working is the norm, and employees are generally given the freedom to plan their own workloads and timings. As the business and industry is cyclical, can get very busy at certain times and can also be quieter at others.
Although management is working on this, the formal training offering could be improved.
This is a green energy company.
Great colleagues from all over the world (as evidenced by the exotic snacks constantly appearing in the kitchen!).
Bright, modern and (quasi) open-plan office with good IT support.
The free muesli, fruit and snacks are particularly welcome!
Communal kitchen/eating area is used by most employees, which is great for meeting people from different teams.
Management are open to feedback.
The workforce is very international with employees from all continents. Over 50% of the workforce is female, including at management level. This fosters a diverse and equal culture. Lots of working parents/caregivers at all levels.
Generally the work is very interesting and challenging. However, as this is a relatively small company (circa. 100 employees), you should expect to do your own admin.
So verdient kununu Geld.