23 von 61 Bewertungen von Mitarbeiter:innen(gefiltert)kununu Prüfprozess
kununu Prüfprozess
23 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,2 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Ihr Unternehmen?
kununu Prüfprozess
23 Mitarbeiter:innen haben diesen Arbeitgeber mit durchschnittlich 3,2 Punkten auf einer Skala von 1 bis 5 bewertet.
Zielsetzungen realistisch & somit motivierender gestalten; Mehr Invest (vor allem durch zeitliche Ressourcen) in Weiterentwicklung; day-to-day Feedbackculture etablieren und nicht nur jährlicher Cycle; mehr Balance im Workload; Unterstützung für verbesserte Kommunikation & Kollaboration
Aktuell Stimmung gedrückt durch Abwanderung langjähriger Kolleg:innen. Zumindest wird untereinander transparent darüber gesprochen. Stimmung im Office sonst immer gut. Toller Zusammenhalt und freundschaftliche Verhältnisse.
Hinsichtlich Arbeitszeitenflexibilität & Urlaubsregelungen gut. Urlaub spontan auch mal drin. HO Möglichkeit. Workload aktuell viel.
Durch wenige hierarchische Ebenen sind „Aufstiegschancen“ eher kaum gegeben und trotz theoretisch „Growth Goals“ kann wegen Mangel an Zeit davon selten etwas praktisch umgesetzt werden.
Sehr gut.
Top-down Kommunikation verbessert sich. Fehlende Strukturen und aktueller hoher Workload einiger Team Kolleg:innen verschlechtern Cross-Team Kommunikation & Kollaboration.
Gehalt im unteren Bereich für München, scheinbar wird hier aber bald etwas getan. Benefits nach üblichem Start-Up/Scale-Up: Jobrad, Deutschlandticket oder Wellpass, Lernbudget 1000€, Mental Health Plattform
Having worked at reev for several years, I’ve seen the company through many stages. It used to be a vibrant, collaborative environment with a clear sense of purpose in the e-mobility space. However, recently, there has been a noticeable downturn. Many of the talented, long-term coworkers who built the foundation of the company have moved on, and the atmosphere isn't what it used to be. It’s a shame to see the culture change so rapidly after such a strong start.
I strongly recommend prioritizing the hiring of leaders with deep, proven industry experience for senior roles. Currently, there is a gap in experienced leadership that is affecting strategic stability. Additionally, management should focus on retaining and respecting long-term, senior employees. These individuals carry the company's 'institutional memory,' and losing them to a poor culture or lack of appreciation is hurting team morale and productivity.
Almost all the talented, long-term coworkers I enjoyed working with have left. There is a massive loss of "know-how"
Very poor internal flow of information; management is disconnected from the teams.
Hire actual experts, not friends with 2 years of experience.
Cliques and politics will not get you far away from where you are. Same place for the last 6 years or even less.
Not great when you feel you need to constantly look over your shoulder on who is next to leave or be made to leave.
Nothing is ever enough
In theory, but nothing in reality
Used to care about it but now not anymore, just survival
Poor and not addressed other then by low budget events
Seem unexperienced and feels like they don't know what they are doing
The products that reev has developed recently are very good and therefore among the best on the market compared to the competition.
Strategy: It would be great if strategies were pursued for longer than just three/six months. The constant change of strategy creates uncertainty among employees.
Realistic goal setting: Define goals based on market realities rather than detached from them.
Appreciation and recognition: A certain level of appreciation, especially from the C-level and Head-of levels, would be fantastic and would help motivate the workforce.
Initially all was good. Lots of opportunity to learn and improve. Hybrid work. Always accept new an positive change
Recently, there has been a noticeable decline in task coordination and alignment with broader organizational goals. Long-term employees are not receiving the recognition or support they deserve, which has impacted morale and loyalty. The current approach tends to focus narrowly on immediate tasks, often at the expense of long-term strategic objectives.
Additionally, the quality and frequency of feedback have been lacking, making it difficult for team members to grow and align with expectations. Leadership and management practices need improvement, particularly in fostering a supportive and balanced work environment. There is also a growing concern about the lack of work-life balance, which, if unaddressed, may further affect productivity and employee retention.
It is important that feedback is delivered in a constructive and supportive manner, with the primary goal of helping employees grow and improve. Rather than focusing on punitive measures, the emphasis should be on coaching, guidance, and providing the necessary resources for success.
Poor feedback given. Manager in my team is really bad
Certain atmosphere that makes the job more interesting, great company to learn a lot, supportive colleagues.
General communication in between departments could be better and transparent.
Create clear growth solutions, salary increase on a yearly basis + performance based. Many workers do much more and are not appreciated for that.
Nothing at all.
Everything.
Since the employer does not listen any suggestion, it is not worth to add anything.
You may wake up jobless tomorrow without any proper explanation. There were layoffs and only explanation was because we wanted so.
There is an obligation to take days off for last week of the year. Then you have to use your paid days off for some days depending on the public holidays of the very last week of the year.
Depending on your department. However between departments the behavior of the colleagues is sometimes quite inappropriate.
There is no more older colleagues. They did not get the value they deserved in my opinion.
They do not care about anyone. I think at managerial level no one knows how to manage a company. It is more like a playground of the management level. They are trying stuff on employees.
There is no proper communication. They talk about transparency and trust but it is just talk and in reality you can not see them.
There is no obvious goals or anything. Everyday is the same. It is impossible to change anything. It is completely closed culture for changes.
Er ist sehr transparent und informiert ausführlich über seine Entscheidungen und Ziele.
Die Erwartungshaltung an Maßnahmen wie der Launch neuer Produkte ist zu optimistisch.
Das Vorgesetztenverhalten finde ich alles in allem sehr gut. Hier und da könnte man abgesegnete Mitarbeiterwünsche schneller umsetzen.
You don't want to share any feedback for improving this company because you basically are not respected and your internal feedback is ignored most of the time when you work there.
Most of people just want to be safe after seeing some people have been fired recently and the layoff last year. Therefore, they don't care much about building relationship with colleagues in the company. Besides that, the company does not invest anything in creating and building good working environment .
No image for building the products. The company just follows what the competitors do. Many people at reev follow Monta's linkedin page for a reason.
Don't expect a good work-life-balance when working here. It is not only about having high workload but also unqualified managers could make you feel uncomfortable sometimes with their decision.
You can find some good colleagues left here but most of good people already left.
Really bad, from the CEO to the C-level managers, especially, in tech department.
Very bad communication. Most of the time it is top-down communication where the managers or leaders decided everything and people have to follow. They basically do not care or open for feedback.
The layoff made last year is the best example of bad communication. The CEO called for a meeting at 9:00 (the meeting request was not sent in advance) and he announced that they decided to let 20 people go. Some people cried after knowing they were laid off but it was not because of being laid off but feeling they were not respected with what they contributed to the company.
Nothing
- Many colleagues are excellent, and for many employees, they are a significant reason for remaining with the company.
- The products are generally of good quality, although their development is often slow and lacks clear focus.
- Excessive workload
- Unrealistic goals
- Lack of focus on employee well-being
- Poor communication
- Lack of cohesion among colleagues
- Favoritism in promotions
- Limited career advancement opportunities
- Non-negotiable salary with opaque criteria for raises
- Underutilized training options with little support
- High turnover rate of good employees
- Many good and long-term employees are leaving the company, which should be a clear signal.
- Gather more feedback and avoid ignoring it or only conducting it quarterly.
- Pay more attention to the selection of team leads, involving team input.
- Provide more career perspectives and opportunities for employees.
- Communicate more transparently with the entire company.
- Set goals that are realistic and achievable again.
The working atmosphere is very negative. There is a constant pressure to meet unattainable targets, which leads to high stress levels and a lack of motivation among employees.
The work-life balance needs improvement. The workload can be heavy. Many employees find themselves taking work home.
Various training options are presented, but they are rarely utilized and seldom discussed after their initial introduction. Most knowledge must be self-taught, often relying on colleagues or internal articles. Career advancement is typically achievable only if one builds good relationships with management, rather than through formal training or merit-based promotions.
The salary is average, with no room for negotiation. Any request for a raise is determined by the team lead and management, who have the final say on the amount. The company uses a ranking system where most employees remain stuck in the middle tier, with no clear guidelines or timeframe for achieving senior status. Salary increases are capped at a certain point. On the plus side, there are some benefits like the JobRad program and MVV tickets, which provide some additional value to the compensation package.
Some Supervisor behavior is disappointing. Team leads are often unqualified and lack the skills needed to support their teams effectively. There is little to no mentorship or guidance.
Communication is a major issue. Important information is often not communicated effectively, leading to confusion and mistakes. There is a lack of transparency from management, and feedback is rarely taken into account.
In terms of gender equality, the company treats men and women equally, ensuring fair treatment regardless of gender. However, those who have good relationships with management often receive preferential treatment. This can lead to seemingly random promotions and advantages that are not based on merit, which undermines the overall fairness in the workplace.
So verdient kununu Geld.